Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26132
| From | "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: ECMAScript and classes |
| Date | 2014-11-13 17:48 +0100 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <m42nbt$bh9$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <td9f5a9f08ameij4n0610eg187jj41suke@4ax.com> <23998077.8isvcokmAf@PointedEars.de> <dsj16apqju2hj2e02tvb9von9ukghmr0uk@4ax.com> <m3qr37$pp4$1@solani.org> <pcr36ah1aea8cihc4gkdpccubdia88jh8l@4ax.com> |
John Harris wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:02:31 +0100, "Christoph M. Becker" > <cmbecker69@arcor.de> wrote: > >> In <news:td9f5a9f08ameij4n0610eg187jj41suke@4ax.com> you have said: >> >> | A language where class instances have no instance data is so >> | restrictive that I don't believe anyone would pay money to use it. > > Why do you think that I'm talking about ECMAScript rather than a > hypothetical and very useless language? Because you had responded to Thomas' statement: | That depends on how you define “class”. The same as it is | unreasonable to define OOP solely by the features of OOP present in, | e.g., Java, it is unreasonable to define “class” only as it is used | elsewhere, and then deny the existence of “classes” or “full support | for classes” in an (draft) Edition of ECMAScript. -- Christoph M. Becker
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-21 10:49 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2014-10-21 12:25 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 11:34 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-21 13:27 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-10-21 19:27 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 00:15 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 14:45 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 15:12 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-01 20:59 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-03 15:56 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-08 19:11 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-10 14:48 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-11-10 15:54 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-10 18:02 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 11:08 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 17:48 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-13 20:32 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-10 23:03 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 17:03 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 14:58 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 18:37 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-24 11:30 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-24 19:45 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-26 10:43 +0000
csiph-web