Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26106

Re: ECMAScript and classes

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: ECMAScript and classes
Date Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:02:31 +0100
Organization solani.org
Lines 37
Message-ID <m3qr37$pp4$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <dtac4adh7n65csjtrqt7lg59tbkfdv01kd@4ax.com> <m25fv6$kmt$1@solani.org> <2243270.nPrEYIu7m9@PointedEars.de> <853i4a5opg36165ev602k2rhrsigpjlanl@4ax.com> <5228816.s9PhMjcOHp@PointedEars.de> <td9f5a9f08ameij4n0610eg187jj41suke@4ax.com> <23998077.8isvcokmAf@PointedEars.de> <dsj16apqju2hj2e02tvb9von9ukghmr0uk@4ax.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace solani.org 1415638951 26404 eJwFwYEBACAEBMCVCv80jsj+I3QH5Wa5ETQMRhoxUROytlUIH7U7ueD3UPKVwjryZOr18Q8ZoRE9 (10 Nov 2014 17:02:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:02:31 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
X-User-ID eJwNx8ERACAIA7CVFITiOECP/UfQX2Lq2xvHzY+NzVewVEGtKRCWWOk9W4qaHhchxPqVy+4HHjsRNQ==
In-Reply-To <dsj16apqju2hj2e02tvb9von9ukghmr0uk@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:6orDoyW2lSp+HzMPxfjTSGoZlYI=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLfAEqZ5DWv4TdwVNzKxIZeHjzXQRpdtJ2j5Rw1uhQpE87mhX36ZgxpP0HIBcQxw==
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:26106

Show key headers only | View raw

John Harris wrote:

> On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:11:11 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> 
>> John Harris wrote:
>>
>>> Therefore it seems to me that instance properties are a sine qua non
                                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> and not describing them in the class definition is clearly a lack of
>>> support.
>>
>> If you mean “instance of a class” and “data/properties of an instance“, 
>> respectively, then 
> 
>> /ex falso quodlibet/
> 
> This is an English language group. 

That *might* be debatable, but at least when you are making this claim,
you should consider avoiding non English phrases as well.


>> And how did you 
>> get the idea that one would have to pay for using an implementation of 
>> ECMAScript?
> 
> As I never said that, it's not a question that has an answer.

In <news:td9f5a9f08ameij4n0610eg187jj41suke@4ax.com> you have said:

| A language where class instances have no instance data is so
| restrictive that I don't believe anyone would pay money to use it.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-21 10:49 +0100
  Re: ECMAScript and classes Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2014-10-21 12:25 +0200
    Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 11:34 +0100
  Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-21 13:27 +0200
    Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-10-21 19:27 +0200
      Re: ECMAScript and classes Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 00:15 +0200
      Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 14:45 +0200
      Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 15:12 +0100
        Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-01 20:59 +0100
          Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-03 15:56 +0000
            Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-08 19:11 +0100
              Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-10 14:48 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-11-10 15:54 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-10 18:02 +0100
                Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 11:08 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 17:48 +0100
                Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-13 20:32 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-10 23:03 +0100
                Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 17:03 +0000
    Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 14:58 +0100
      Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 18:37 +0200
        Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-24 11:30 +0100
          Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-24 19:45 +0200
            Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-26 10:43 +0000

csiph-web