Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #25978
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: ECMAScript and classes |
| Date | Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:37:40 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Lines | 42 |
| Message-ID | <m2basb$ru4$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <dtac4adh7n65csjtrqt7lg59tbkfdv01kd@4ax.com> <m25fv6$kmt$1@solani.org> <f82i4ath9p68jrsomcgg5atkdgrrb9v2rn@4ax.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1414082251 28612 eJwNwgERwDAIA0BLdEmgyCll+Jew/b3gy2/Q5dRo/BkKpyqhOOx35e4oTpEjGBlhsv4jE/gAFHAQSA== (23 Oct 2014 16:37:31 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:37:31 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQkBACAIBLBK8h0QBxT6R3AzAeG6wqC2tuyR8uYmN6trxQJ9zHm0abrOpMGRj6Vqgj4SvBDd |
| In-Reply-To | <f82i4ath9p68jrsomcgg5atkdgrrb9v2rn@4ax.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:XK7JhYBkkC/QrYyK7bDHMV88nfg= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVREhkHaDN/iPovQ9O45wgGBDkX1fF/E4pA91L6DiTY7B+a5K5C3zVdq4LMGURAA== |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:25978 |
Show key headers only | View raw
John Harris wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:27:38 +0200, "Christoph M. Becker" > <cmbecker69@arcor.de> wrote: > >> Edition >> 5.1 (or maybe 5 already) introduced Object.seal()[1] which can be >> applied to the prototype object. > > It wouldn't be just the prototype object. It would be all the > user-defined objects in the prototype chain and each class instance > object as it is created. Usually you wouldn't seal the class instances, though, but rather prevent their extension and maybe remove the configurable attribute on the individual properties. > All of which has to done by the Poor Old > Programmer, of course. The "Poor Old Programmer" could, however, write a function that does all this for him. >> Ecma-262 Edition 6 might introduce >> "maximally minimal" classes[2] and private name objects[3] which would >> provide better support for classes in the classical sense. > <snip> > > The current draft ES6 allows only one constructor function per class. This restriction applies to several object-oriented programming languages with classical inheritance. > So, ES6 will likely still only provide partial *support* for classes, > while still allowing full *implementation* of classes as before. What would be full *support* for classes. Isn't multiple inheritance an important concept, for instance, which is only supported by very few languages? What about multiple dispatch? -- Christoph M. Becker
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-21 10:49 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2014-10-21 12:25 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 11:34 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-21 13:27 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-10-21 19:27 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 00:15 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 14:45 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 15:12 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-01 20:59 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-03 15:56 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-08 19:11 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-10 14:48 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-11-10 15:54 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-10 18:02 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 11:08 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 17:48 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-13 20:32 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-10 23:03 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 17:03 +0000
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 14:58 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 18:37 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-24 11:30 +0100
Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-24 19:45 +0200
Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-26 10:43 +0000
csiph-web