Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29399
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Primality sieve challenge |
| Date | Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:20:38 +0000 |
| Organization | Home |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <jlCBcrLGfWoWFwkC@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <5b608a56-e16b-4467-a0ce-4e30f6796920@googlegroups.com> <871t9gfa2z.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <8b01caa9-8c09-4e69-915b-81b67eba7edc@googlegroups.com> <0b16c016-5128-4b68-8046-fbec55700ec3@googlegroups.com> <60329a65-27f8-483e-bd6e-e262e952ee6f@googlegroups.com> <871t9fd6p7.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <XnsA5937CEFD5E87eejj99@194.109.6.166> <ih9q9b9hn97rstn00pcq8mgttf84ftgk71@4ax.com> <XnsA593C548780B7eejj99@194.109.6.166> <gukq9bdam69pinh9q10djlq43vv8mv3a55@4ax.com> <57bd7c90-81fd-4fe9-b329-1d58db4ff3f1@googlegroups.com> <dfc4d40c-d9ef-4dab-a0b4-16d0f55776a1@googlegroups.com> <n7k49m$54l$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="01da9e6251d9b3ee47bb70bebae42d53"; logging-data="19514"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/B/0uHm9X6/D71yR6TQclcFcsxRhOXRyo=" |
| User-Agent | Turnpike/6.05-S (<hY+ExRCkcsssDA9uJ+0bCn8+UA>) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:AiDfQ0ASoj2CJG7KrA8xb79zomo= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:29399 |
Show key headers only | View raw
In comp.lang.javascript message <n7k49m$54l$1@news.albasani.net>, Tue, 19 Jan 2016 02:42:13, Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> posted: > >A common estimate for the number of atoms in the observable universe is >10^80. That's a number with ~80 digits. You're going for a number with >17425170 digits. The raw decimal number takes ~17MB to store in an >uncompressed ASCII file, like you're proposing. If you were to print it >out, you'd need around 4k-5k sheets of paper (pages). <g> That shows the importance of optimising the base. One would only need about 5/6 as many digits in ordinary Hex. In binary, one would need 3.3 times as many digits; but each digit could be compressed on the paper to a single black or white pixel, and one could do even better with coloured pixels. I estimate that a really good inkjet printer might get the whole lot onto a single sheet of paper. </g> Via the Wayback Machine, http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-misc0.htm has JavaScript code for Sieves of Eratosthenes. -- (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ¬@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Merlyn Web Site < > - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 01:40 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 02:20 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-17 16:24 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 09:03 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 09:22 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 11:32 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 00:13 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 04:10 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-18 01:20 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-18 12:16 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-18 11:25 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-18 12:43 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 04:18 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 04:25 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-18 09:52 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-18 19:23 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-18 10:48 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-18 13:09 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 13:14 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-18 22:45 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-18 22:56 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 15:02 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 16:04 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 02:42 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 23:34 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-19 01:34 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-19 06:23 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-19 07:10 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-19 07:15 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-19 08:34 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-19 16:54 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-19 08:57 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-19 10:18 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-19 10:59 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 01:33 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-20 02:10 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-20 02:21 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-20 10:45 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-20 06:43 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 15:21 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 03:18 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-01-21 12:12 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-21 23:20 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 19:44 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-23 21:50 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 01:26 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-23 17:54 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@no-spam.ws> - 2016-01-24 13:34 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-25 00:21 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 03:08 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-24 19:35 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 03:53 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-18 19:32 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-17 19:51 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 13:43 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2016-01-17 12:46 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-18 09:50 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-18 20:09 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-18 19:28 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-18 21:37 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 13:12 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 13:46 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-01-18 14:00 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-19 13:47 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-19 14:04 +0000
Re: Primality sieve challenge Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-19 19:59 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 10:55 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-19 20:04 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 13:42 -0800
Re: Primality sieve challenge Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-21 17:21 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-03 19:52 +0100
Re: Primality sieve challenge Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-19 19:43 +0000
csiph-web