Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #38160
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-27 23:47 -0800 |
| References | <eab890f6-26af-41ce-b4cc-964fddf3b7a7@googlegroups.com> <b288f269-4517-411e-a2f1-bf82b3d73a41@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <f001b2ec-33fe-4a90-a3c8-8a71eced5ad1@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" |
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
Den tisdag 28 januari 2020 kl. 08:22:42 UTC+1 skrev Jonas Thörnvall: > Den tisdag 28 januari 2020 kl. 08:18:34 UTC+1 skrev Jonas Thörnvall: > > What is the justification for using the parent child notation between documents that is loaded from same source, for example iframes? > > > > What is the idea behind it, why is it there? > > Is it because element ID's could have same ID? > There is something that bugs me about the whole thing. > It seems unnecessary, it is just a bunch of connected text and everything in it have ID, the iframe have it all the elements have it, so why would i need to specify a document source, for my variables, functions and elements. One should not add complexity where ther is no need for it...
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-27 23:18 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-27 23:22 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-27 23:47 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2020-01-28 01:37 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 01:59 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2020-01-28 18:43 +0700
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 03:52 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 03:59 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2020-01-29 20:07 +0700
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-02-05 08:02 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2020-02-06 12:50 +0100
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-02-05 08:05 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-02-05 08:06 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-01-28 05:17 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 17:54 -0800
Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-01-28 15:25 +0100
csiph-web