Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation"

Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Date	2020-02-05 08:05 -0800
References	(1 earlier) <b288f269-4517-411e-a2f1-bf82b3d73a41@googlegroups.com> <r4d7ymvbnbez$.1h8ekjc3uhq7r$.dlg@40tude.net> <9882dd06-7282-4636-beb3-07e424520b05@googlegroups.com> <8a0f9d92-5f3b-484e-adac-f94c75f60601@googlegroups.com> <1rtoacq0gryv2.1ln3kyhzh6a5a.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID	<a8c31e2d-36a7-446f-994e-afa709edb9ec@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation"
From	Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Den onsdag 29 januari 2020 kl. 14:07:14 UTC+1 skrev JJ:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:59:43 -0800 (PST), Jonas Thörnvall wrote: 
> > Den tisdag 28 januari 2020 kl. 12:52:21 UTC+1 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> >> 
> >> Yeah that is the question why are they connected hiearchly, they are
> >> just text masses. I can understand the problem when you take in external
> >> sources but why do a developer have to deal with that "unneccesary
> >> hierarchy", the hierarchy only needed when linking other sources. 
> >> 
> >> Still to this day one have do eeal with this idiocy, you never see a
> >> newspaper have need for such a hierarchy, it is just information with ID
> >> dynamic or not really does not matter. 
> >> 
> >> My point is the hierarchy is totally pointless "at least for a single
> >> developer", maybe it is fear of ID clashes different people doing
> >> different pages. I am not sure why the hierarchy is there?
> > 
> > Well maybe something with searchengines and metainformation, but it seem
> > pointless since iframes do not need any.
> 
> You only see the surface.
> 
> Considering that an element can be within other element, there has to be an
> information describing who contains what. Otherwise, elements can't be
> within other element.
> 
> We're not living in a flat Earth, you know...

No apparently we are living on the pumpkin head earth where you can see southern cross from Gran Canaria LoL

Thread

HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-27 23:18 -0800
  Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-27 23:22 -0800
    Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-27 23:47 -0800
      Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2020-01-28 01:37 -0800
        Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 01:59 -0800
    Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2020-01-28 18:43 +0700
      Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 03:52 -0800
        Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 03:59 -0800
          Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2020-01-29 20:07 +0700
            Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-02-05 08:02 -0800
              Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2020-02-06 12:50 +0100
            Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-02-05 08:05 -0800
            Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-02-05 08:06 -0800
  Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-01-28 05:17 -0800
    Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-01-28 17:54 -0800
  Re: HTML dom "document parent, child notation" Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-01-28 15:25 +0100

csiph-web