Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #34933
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.247.233.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Is JS a functional programming language? |
| Date | Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:44:41 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <dab4585f-e4e7-a5d7-e506-37c452908dc1@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <2ea2803e-c39d-40e0-b8ed-136c3dc9b4e0@googlegroups.com> <4mv0ddt3bre9bbiofnvabnbamlp9jfj072@4ax.com> <15901681.8V3EAehsKz@PointedEars.de> <idl3ddhclidkc7rtn9hs90utlvb3t7a3em@4ax.com> <3dd0b784-9634-4047-b79b-a171d1e1d099@googlegroups.com> <611cba1f-e8f1-4ca1-8eb5-5e10456200d1@googlegroups.com> <pbdh4g$1rjm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1703120.hZdRbIOfhN@PointedEars.de> <7a88c7d4-6343-4152-b0a0-0aea9859bfe5@googlegroups.com> <5bcea078-8dc0-4f8e-a730-2f93d925c781@googlegroups.com> <80de186b-13f0-45f6-a427-52e844db3edc@googlegroups.com> <63f44f57-f90f-43b3-b51a-8a9c30cea80c@googlegroups.com> <6aeacc78-ba24-4c5f-ab94-2d6fe1ad5d3f@googlegroups.com> <90aa23ab-ea8a-4fa9-8f5f-77e6a99211f8@googlegroups.com> <0ab002cd-34c4-4ace-86cc-dc4b583337ef@googlegroups.com> <6ac594f1-3d9b-4580-a14c-4bdac36558d2@googlegroups.com> <pblnp6$ua8$1@solani.org> <b17040d5-8081-4704-835a-a967feffbbe5@googlegroups.com> <2432812.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> <2b542d73-0446-4a88-afa0-5662de1e35d6@googlegroups.com> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="247.233.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch:178.197.233.247"; logging-data="25251"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:mcYsAedD6qygLwARX/vc1NRoYJs= |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| In-Reply-To | <2b542d73-0446-4a88-afa0-5662de1e35d6@googlegroups.com> |
| X-User-ID | U2FsdGVkX18F0z9yZq/d/As8dKNKIa7+8dpBpQ/h8ahjeZ75tf9juQ== |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:34933 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: >> > The main point I was setting up with Julio was that Object-Oriented and >> > Functional programming are duals[1] of each other […] >> > >> > [1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duality_(mathematics)> >> But *that* is _not_ true. Because you can employ the object-oriented >> programming paradigm *without* employing the functional paradigm, and >> vice-versa. And there are, among implementations of those two paradigms, >> pure object-oriented programming languages (e.g., Visual Basic) as well >> as there are pure functional programming languages (e.g., Haskell). I >> happen to have used both, so I can confirm > > I don't think you can include any version of VB in the category of Pure > OOP. Every one of them I've seen has procedural constructs. Semantic fallacy and /argumentum ad ignorantiam/. When I am distinguishing “pure object-oriented” and “pure functional” programming languages, I am of course referring to the fact that one set has none of the *key* properties of the other. > For example, compare the solutions of Smalltalk and Visual Basic : > > <http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Sieve_of_Eratosthenes#Visual_Basic> There is “Debug.Print”, is there not? > <http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Sieve_of_Eratosthenes#Smalltalk> > > 'if/then/else' would be methods of boolean in a pure OO. Utter nonsense. > Also IIRC, 'Nothing' in VB has never been an object. Irrelevant. > [tl;dr yet] -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Trying to create array of object literals bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2018-04-12 12:17 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2018-04-12 12:26 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Maik Koenig <usenetspam@maikkoenig.de> - 2018-04-12 21:47 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-12 12:49 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-13 10:27 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-13 10:57 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-13 23:38 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-14 11:22 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-14 07:25 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-14 09:09 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-16 09:43 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-16 02:04 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-16 11:23 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:32 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-17 23:37 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-18 16:18 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-19 23:08 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-20 10:17 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-20 12:45 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-20 19:08 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals "c.l.js" <trollhunter@curiosity.kills.no> - 2018-04-20 17:04 -0300
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-20 13:15 -0700
Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-21 02:35 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-21 01:36 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-21 11:46 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-21 11:48 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-21 23:53 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-22 10:33 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-23 00:27 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-23 11:50 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-23 12:00 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? (was: Trying to create array of object literals) "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-23 15:07 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2018-04-24 00:47 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-23 16:12 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2018-04-24 01:30 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-23 16:45 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-24 09:54 +0100
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-04-24 10:17 +0000
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-24 12:02 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-25 05:04 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-25 02:16 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-25 02:20 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-25 18:22 +0100
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2018-04-25 17:25 +0000
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-25 14:50 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-25 14:39 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-29 20:44 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-04-29 13:45 -0700
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "c.l.js" <trollhunter@curiosity.kills.no> - 2018-04-21 19:51 -0300
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-22 01:18 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-22 02:19 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2018-04-22 01:52 +0000
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-22 04:30 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2018-04-22 02:45 +0000
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-22 05:55 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2018-04-22 04:04 +0000
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-22 10:59 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-22 11:03 +0100
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-22 12:50 +0200
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-23 09:19 +0100
Re: Is JS a functional programming language? "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2018-04-22 12:58 +0000
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-16 10:02 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-16 02:05 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-16 11:27 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-16 02:33 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2018-04-16 14:03 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:40 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-17 09:45 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-18 03:25 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-18 15:50 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-18 16:08 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-19 03:34 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-19 10:37 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-19 19:02 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-19 03:25 +0200
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:37 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-16 11:48 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-17 09:52 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-04-17 03:22 -0700
Re: Trying to create array of object literals John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-04-17 18:28 +0100
Re: Trying to create array of object literals bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2018-04-13 04:08 -0700
csiph-web