Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #38553
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost2.xs4all.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" |
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
| References | <149e8fbb-13eb-42d4-8ab4-cb38e0e8bd70o@googlegroups.com> <XnsABFEA0E3CFBEEeejj99@194.109.6.166> <493f126c-7318-48b0-bca9-8d9d6a85311eo@googlegroups.com> <3eec9e74-d659-41de-92c6-9ac4178521c6o@googlegroups.com> <XnsABFEF2E7D3D5Aeejj99@194.109.6.166> <fece77d4-b0a5-4430-bbcc-7c2352252750o@googlegroups.com> <XnsABFFAB1F4C84eejj99@194.109.6.166> <db144980-b33e-4ae9-989f-837eb0c7f6e4o@googlegroups.com> |
| Date | Sun, 19 Jul 2020 23:07:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsABFFEB497EEE5eejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Xnews/2009.05.01 |
| Lines | 37 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 7709e065.newszilla.xs4all.nl |
| X-Trace | G=sUA43eIz,C=U2FsdGVkX18R3qoMWVkcn0vb9OVQfrinf+inhUk/cA/s7n4a/nuzDNjewUJUClIQLJdSNPoxuGrznJL/KpHCv15bRszBlhSt4gJxSN7Uqnqs9mfYT1FXBmmyCwBVWw7y |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:38553 |
Show key headers only | View raw
=?UTF-8?Q?Jonas_Th=C3=B6rnvall?= <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote on 19 Jul 2020 in comp.lang.javascript: >> Yes, and since the barrs have to be able to be seen by someone, >> [otherwis > e >> why produce them in the first place,] that minimal viewing surely is a >> la > rge >> multiple of the time needed to show a picture, a svh, a css stylized >> element. >> >> So optimalisation is not in any way efficient. >> >> -- >> Evertjan. >> The Netherlands. >> (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress) > > You say writing out a full picture for every 5 bars eveny amount of x > seconds is faster then render the characterset or drawlines? No, where do you read that. > I feel hesitant. Hesitant is doubtful to do something. You could measure the results, and compare them to the estimated actual time neccesary on screeen. -- Evertjan. The Netherlands. (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 05:48 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 15:48 +0200
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 07:30 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 11:43 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 23:52 +0200
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 15:32 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 16:49 +0200
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 08:57 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 08:59 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 23:17 +0200
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 15:30 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 19:34 -0700
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-07-20 10:05 +0200
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 23:07 +0200
Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 23:49 +0200
csiph-web