Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #38545

Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles"

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles"
From "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
References (1 earlier) <XnsABFEA0E3CFBEEeejj99@194.109.6.166> <493f126c-7318-48b0-bca9-8d9d6a85311eo@googlegroups.com> <3eec9e74-d659-41de-92c6-9ac4178521c6o@googlegroups.com> <XnsABFEF2E7D3D5Aeejj99@194.109.6.166> <fece77d4-b0a5-4430-bbcc-7c2352252750o@googlegroups.com>
Date 2020-07-19 16:49 +0200
Message-ID <XnsABFFAB1F4C84eejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

=?UTF-8?Q?Jonas_Th=C3=B6rnvall?= <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote on 19
Jul 2020 in comp.lang.javascript: 

>> Since they are ment to be seen and interpreted by someone, 
>> as I presume, the number of cpu-clock-cycles seems unimportant.
>> 
> No evertjan i will write out notes in realtime sof every 5 bars or so
> the sheet if full and screen have to be updated with a new sheet. 

Yes, and since the barrs have to be able to be seen by someone, [otherwise 
why produce them in the first place,] that minimal viewing surely is a large 
multiple of the time needed to show a picture, a svh, a css stylized 
element.

So optimalisation is not in any way efficient.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 05:48 -0700
  Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 15:48 +0200
    Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 07:30 -0700
      Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 11:43 -0700
        Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 23:52 +0200
          Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 15:32 -0700
            Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 16:49 +0200
              Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 08:57 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 08:59 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 23:17 +0200
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 15:30 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 19:34 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-07-20 10:05 +0200
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 23:07 +0200
      Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 23:49 +0200

csiph-web