Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles"

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost2.xs4all.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles"
From	"Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
References	<149e8fbb-13eb-42d4-8ab4-cb38e0e8bd70o@googlegroups.com> <XnsABFEA0E3CFBEEeejj99@194.109.6.166> <493f126c-7318-48b0-bca9-8d9d6a85311eo@googlegroups.com>
Date	Sat, 18 Jul 2020 23:49:18 +0200
Message-ID	<XnsABFEF253CC87Deejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink)
User-Agent	Xnews/2009.05.01
Lines	47
NNTP-Posting-Host	47d2766f.newszilla.xs4all.nl
X-Trace	G=Uk5/pUPc,C=U2FsdGVkX19CgUr+9JNw1H987P/cAeixNFniSPnv+R1h+b10RJttAhYRdt2R7aHW7AM7K1evGX9wXHsHz+zVwDFErgRTw7BIRKvTs6l0Lq0+8kksKYGHezYL1GtqgJ5T
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:38536

Show key headers only | View raw

=?UTF-8?Q?Jonas_Th=C3=B6rnvall?= <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote on 18
Jul 2020 in comp.lang.javascript: 

> Well there is a unicode "character/symbol set for canvas",

Is there?

> i just wonder is i should draw the lines or use the bar character. 

According to an authority?

> Which would be most wise performance wise... 

Wise according to whom ?

> No need to be upset

Is there ever a *need* to be upset?

I don't think so, being upset, does that help you?

> this just about music notation "music sheets" 

Is it?

> no need to get upset, 

You are repeating yourself.

> noone going to lock you up Evertjan, 

How would you know? 

You would have to know everyone,
and that would not be very efficient, would it?.

> even if it may not seem out of question. 

It might be.

Are you starting a joke, Jonas?


-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 05:48 -0700
  Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 15:48 +0200
    Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 07:30 -0700
      Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 11:43 -0700
        Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 23:52 +0200
          Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-18 15:32 -0700
            Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 16:49 +0200
              Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 08:57 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 08:59 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 23:17 +0200
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 15:30 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 19:34 -0700
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-07-20 10:05 +0200
                Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-19 23:07 +0200
      Re: Unicode signs vs lines "saving clockcycles" "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-07-18 23:49 +0200

csiph-web