Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32869
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Understanding someone's code |
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
| References | <WumdnYlb48xrFUHFnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <34qdnaF51IrJJUHFnZ2dnUU7-WednZ2d@westnet.com.au> <XnsA7487B53461A9eejj99@194.109.6.166> <obir0r$p3e$1@softins.softins.co.uk> |
| Date | 2017-03-30 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA7488E8B9765eejj99@194.109.6.166> (permalink) |
tony@mountifield.org (Tony Mountifield) wrote on 30 Mar 2017 in
comp.lang.javascript:
>> > if (b.getPageInView) {
>> > a = b.getPageInView();
>> > if (a) {
>> > F = a;
>> > document.getElementById("pageNumber").value = a;
>> > }
>> >}
>>
>> No.
>
> Why not? It looks equivalent to me, in that specific case.
Incorrect, did you test it?
After:
F = 7;
a = 0;
if (a) {
F = a;
document.getElementById("pageNumber").value = a;
}
F will be 7,
while after:
F = 7;
a = 0;
F = (F = a) && (document.getElementById("pageNumber").value = a);
F will be 0;
> If you believe
> it to be a wrong interpretation of the original code, why not provide
> a better one
This is not a church,
faith does not come into coding,
faith being nonsense anyway.
> , instead of the unrelated and simple example below?
I try to teach to the best of my knowledge,
not take over the coding,
this NG not being a helpdesk.
--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Understanding someone's code Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:26 +1100
Re: Understanding someone's code Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-30 18:48 +1100
Re: Understanding someone's code "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-30 12:07 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code tony@mountifield.org (Tony Mountifield) - 2017-03-30 11:43 +0000
Re: Understanding someone's code "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-30 14:00 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code tony@mountifield.org (Tony Mountifield) - 2017-03-30 13:44 +0000
Re: Understanding someone's code "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-30 19:07 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2017-03-30 18:58 +0700
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-03-30 18:13 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-03-30 18:13 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-03-31 10:30 +0100
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-02 14:41 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-02 19:05 +0100
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-10 05:00 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 10:03 +0100
csiph-web