Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32984
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Understanding someone's code |
| Date | 2017-04-10 05:00 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1879013.ucPXOAX30I@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <34qdnaF51IrJJUHFnZ2dnUU7-WednZ2d@westnet.com.au> <2373677.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> <cd8sdcp67fc0i1358uklik8t3dcpifp8f3@4ax.com> <2865491.44csPzL39Z@PointedEars.de> <59f2ec1mhao1p6qkqlok3dor0s3slsmpni@4ax.com> |
John G Harris wrote: > […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >> John G Harris wrote: >>> [2] Note that a variable is defined to be a property. >> The concept of a Variable Object of an execution context, with the >> identifiers of variables declared in it as the names of its properties, >> was superseded by the concept of a VariableEnvironment Lexical >> Environment whose EnvironmentRecord holds bindings created by >> VariableStatements within an execution context in ECMAScript Edition >> 5(.1) (2009-12, 2011-06). See also ES 2016, § 8.3. > > True, I missed that, but variables have the same allowed Value types > as do properties: […] Correct, but irrelevant. In the majority of cases, i.e. in the majority of currently used implementations of ECMAScript, variables are _not_ properties; contrary to your statement. And without further qualification, “ECMAScript” ought to refer to the current Edition of ECMAScript (here). Your newsreader is broken: it has mangled properly declared and encoded Unicode characters in my posting when you quoted it. See also RFC 5536, section “MIME Conformance”. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Understanding someone's code Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:26 +1100
Re: Understanding someone's code Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-30 18:48 +1100
Re: Understanding someone's code "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-30 12:07 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code tony@mountifield.org (Tony Mountifield) - 2017-03-30 11:43 +0000
Re: Understanding someone's code "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-30 14:00 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code tony@mountifield.org (Tony Mountifield) - 2017-03-30 13:44 +0000
Re: Understanding someone's code "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2017-03-30 19:07 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2017-03-30 18:58 +0700
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-03-30 18:13 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-03-30 18:13 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-03-31 10:30 +0100
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-02 14:41 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-02 19:05 +0100
Re: Understanding someone's code Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-10 05:00 +0200
Re: Understanding someone's code John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 10:03 +0100
csiph-web