Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #12667

Re: multiple dynamic text fields

Date 2012-03-14 10:51 +1100
From Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: multiple dynamic text fields
References (5 earlier) <kisll7hog3lbuv6l7tb2l2ovp9oeivdj5q@4ax.com> <jjias1$aiv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <f4612afd-0c05-42ae-b66c-ba8f797ec901@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <jjo9g6$9of$1@speranza.aioe.org> <6325cb13-a1c2-447d-8ee8-710e481d4c0d@k29g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <SZydnYa7O6sNQMLSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 14/03/2012 9:36 AM, David Mark wrote:

> Because jQuery is very poorly written.  I recently posted some
> examples of this on the JSPerf site, pitting one-liner cross-browser
> functions vs. My Library (a four-year-old library) vs. jQuery.
> Unbelievably, jQuery was consistently 10-100 times slower at basic
> tasks.  Attaching listeners was particularly slow (not to mention
> awkward).  Not long after, they copied my concise on/off methods, but
> I doubt that syntactic sugar improved their performance any. :(
>
> http://jsperf.com/browse/david-mark
> http://jsperf.com/adding-and-removing-listeners-part-2

1. Its unbelievable that jquery is so much slower in the 'setting the 
style attribute' test. It completed about 145K operations/sec versus 
3.2M operations/sec for the cross browser way. The cross browser way is 
more that 22 times faster!

2. Some of the tests give a script error when run in Firefox 10.0.2.

3. Where are the jquery users to give a different view of the tests/results?

Andrew Poulos

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

multiple dynamic text fields hipa <hipa.invalid@telenet.be> - 2012-03-04 13:00 +0000
  Re: multiple dynamic text fields Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-03-05 14:33 +1100
    Re: multiple dynamic text fields hipa <hipa.invalid@telenet.be> - 2012-03-08 18:14 +0000
      Re: multiple dynamic text fields Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-03-09 17:38 +1100
        Re: multiple dynamic text fields hipa <hipa.invalid@telenet.be> - 2012-03-09 18:46 +0000
          Re: multiple dynamic text fields Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-03-10 17:19 +1100
            Re: multiple dynamic text fields hipa <hipa.invalid@telenet.be> - 2012-03-11 13:55 +0000
              Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 20:16 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields hipa <hipa.invalid@telenet.be> - 2012-03-13 20:08 +0000
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 15:36 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-14 10:51 +1100
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 18:12 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 18:55 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-14 15:05 +1100
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 21:38 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 21:56 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 22:49 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-14 17:05 +1100
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 00:23 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 22:06 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-14 17:07 +1100
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 00:28 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 22:11 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields hipa <hipa.invalid@telenet.be> - 2012-03-14 21:56 +0000
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 14:58 -0700
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields hipa <hipa.invalid@telenet.be> - 2012-03-15 06:27 +0000
                Re: multiple dynamic text fields David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 23:46 -0700

csiph-web