Re: TWO lines of code for transforms?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: TWO lines of code for transforms?
Date	Sat, 11 May 2019 16:59:18 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	48
Message-ID	<87bm09yobt.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References	<de0b77b1-4e91-4d2f-b449-8f554ad3bd6f@googlegroups.com> <7fdff281-9436-e4a8-c2a6-c019042f329d@PointedEars.de> <qb40tr$135n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <rm8ddet980ko7uab12211t34838pk3oae7@4ax.com> <960fe8b0-169c-4adf-930d-8ebd81f3eab3@googlegroups.com> <87h8a1yv6a.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <80603aed-84db-4f6a-bd9d-f577c047c46b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Injection-Info	reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="61670e48fab482e439fd28c5b132cb3b"; logging-data="17516"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18txI7ixeB9k1nBmXrd2PhaXSqMXA6GeCU="
Cancel-Lock	sha1:gRz77OQjYavfXbO635BSFBZiquk= sha1:fQ6OUbl1l1yeRvtof/4IGC4Bv0I=
X-BSB-Auth	1.13af16227b5671c0a300.20190511165918BST.87bm09yobt.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:36592

Show key headers only | View raw

Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> writes:

> On Saturday, 11 May 2019 15:31:31 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse  wrote:
>> Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> writes:
>> <cut>
>> > Using a real name and email is essential Usenet etiquette.
>> 
>> Curious.  Do you have a citation?
>
>   "It violates RFCs, the rules upon which Usenet is built."
>
> <http://www.faqs.org/faqs/net-abuse-faq/munging-address/>

I was talking about what you replied to, and what Thomas Lhan and John
Harris were talking about: using a real name.  Maybe I cut too much.
Did you not mean to include using a real name as essential etiquette?

(Using a valid email address is a good idea, but not essential
etiquette.  If it were, FAQs like the one you cite would not spend so
much time explaining the right way to do it.)

<cut>
>> I've used Usenet for decades 
>
> Liar.

Eh?  How can you possibly know?

>> and was unaware of this essential piece of etiquette.
>
> There is no worse deaf... moron.
>
>> None of the usual sources
>> mention it (for example the RFC about "netiquette").
>
> "Usual" my ass, you other piece of crap...

The usual sources include the RFC on netiquette and people like Jukka
Korpela who was a widely respected writer on such topics.  But can you
get more "usual" than an RFC?  Why would the RFC omit an mention of this
essential piece of netiquette.

> HTH and go fuck yourself,

Charming as ever!

-- 
Ben.

Thread

TWO lines of code for transforms? groovee@cyberdude.com - 2019-05-10 03:52 -0700
  Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-05-10 13:38 +0200
  Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-05-10 14:27 +0200
    Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2019-05-10 14:13 +0000
      Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-05-11 11:26 +0100
        Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-05-11 04:20 -0700
          Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-05-11 14:31 +0100
            Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-05-11 08:29 -0700
              Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-05-11 16:59 +0100
                Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-05-11 17:55 +0200
              Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-05-11 18:31 +0100
                Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2019-05-11 22:01 -0700
          Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-05-11 18:18 +0100
            Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2019-05-11 22:04 -0700
              Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-05-12 10:27 +0100
                Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2019-05-14 10:44 -0700
  Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Ram Tobolski <ramtob@gmail.com> - 2019-05-11 07:06 -0700
    Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? groovee@cyberdude.com - 2019-05-13 04:28 -0700
      Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-05-13 13:38 +0100
        Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? groovee@cyberdude.com - 2019-05-13 07:31 -0700
          Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Ram Tobolski <ramtob@gmail.com> - 2019-05-13 09:11 -0700
          Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-05-13 17:14 +0100
            Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? groovee@cyberdude.com - 2019-05-14 23:56 -0700
              Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-05-15 09:43 +0200
              Re: TWO lines of code for transforms? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-05-15 22:06 +0100

csiph-web