Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: TWO lines of code for transforms?
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 16:59:18 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <87bm09yobt.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References: <de0b77b1-4e91-4d2f-b449-8f554ad3bd6f@googlegroups.com> <7fdff281-9436-e4a8-c2a6-c019042f329d@PointedEars.de> <qb40tr$135n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <rm8ddet980ko7uab12211t34838pk3oae7@4ax.com> <960fe8b0-169c-4adf-930d-8ebd81f3eab3@googlegroups.com> <87h8a1yv6a.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <80603aed-84db-4f6a-bd9d-f577c047c46b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="61670e48fab482e439fd28c5b132cb3b"; logging-data="17516"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18txI7ixeB9k1nBmXrd2PhaXSqMXA6GeCU="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gRz77OQjYavfXbO635BSFBZiquk= sha1:fQ6OUbl1l1yeRvtof/4IGC4Bv0I=
X-BSB-Auth: 1.13af16227b5671c0a300.20190511165918BST.87bm09yobt.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:36592

Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> writes:

> On Saturday, 11 May 2019 15:31:31 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse  wrote:
>> Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> writes:
>> <cut>
>> > Using a real name and email is essential Usenet etiquette.
>> 
>> Curious.  Do you have a citation?
>
>   "It violates RFCs, the rules upon which Usenet is built."
>
> <http://www.faqs.org/faqs/net-abuse-faq/munging-address/>

I was talking about what you replied to, and what Thomas Lhan and John
Harris were talking about: using a real name.  Maybe I cut too much.
Did you not mean to include using a real name as essential etiquette?

(Using a valid email address is a good idea, but not essential
etiquette.  If it were, FAQs like the one you cite would not spend so
much time explaining the right way to do it.)

<cut>
>> I've used Usenet for decades 
>
> Liar.

Eh?  How can you possibly know?

>> and was unaware of this essential piece of etiquette.
>
> There is no worse deaf... moron.
>
>> None of the usual sources
>> mention it (for example the RFC about "netiquette").
>
> "Usual" my ass, you other piece of crap...

The usual sources include the RFC on netiquette and people like Jukka
Korpela who was a widely respected writer on such topics.  But can you
get more "usual" than an RFC?  Why would the RFC omit an mention of this
essential piece of netiquette.

> HTH and go fuck yourself,

Charming as ever!

-- 
Ben.