Re: Refer object within itself

X-Received	by 10.66.146.10 with SMTP id sy10mr19052882pab.24.1457398840962; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:00:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received	by 10.50.25.196 with SMTP id e4mr271408igg.8.1457398840925; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:00:40 -0800 (PST)
Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!hb3no12379167igb.0!news-out.google.com!pn7ni3369igb.0!nntp.google.com!hb3no12379160igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Date	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:00:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To	<XnsA5C4E9E1D8DF7eejj99@194.109.6.166>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.216.237.40; posting-account=soEzFAoAAAA9UnLg4OfAIq1tieDGxldE
NNTP-Posting-Host	32.216.237.40
References	<76ydnVazm-uPoU3LnZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <dfd01b06-7ffd-44e6-94be-7ee2fdab0e18@googlegroups.com> <XnsA5BCEB469CEDBeejj99@194.109.6.166> <setter-20160228231357@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <XnsA5BCEDE00D83Feejj99@194.109.6.166> <nb205k$ie7$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA5BDC9B85FA3Aeejj99@194.109.6.166> <nb46cq$leb$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA5BEB0B2826D1eejj99@194.109.6.166> <nb4liq$kat$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA5BECFDEEEC11eejj99@194.109.6.166> <nbdag0$ggd$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA5C292470C038eejj99@194.109.6.166> <00d49959-20f9-43ec-8d80-dc2d3991a31c@googlegroups.com> <XnsA5C379E8FC4CDeejj99@194.109.6.166> <ac1be59e-d61f-4a36-9ab8-3216b0043ad7@googlegroups.com> <XnsA5C46D5A48D05eejj99@194.109.6.166> <3655f397-1fa2-4d4a-a36f-a1fa688e9461@googlegroups.com> <XnsA5C4E9E1D8DF7eejj99@194.109.6.166>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<5fae0ca3-2b2b-4844-ac02-243db4e2f346@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Refer object within itself
From	Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com>
Injection-Date	Tue, 08 Mar 2016 01:00:40 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:29852

Show key headers only | View raw

Evertjan wrote:
> Scott Sauyet wrote:
> 
>>> while my opinion is different.
>> 
>> Do you really believe it necessary to apologize for every opinion
>> stated on USENET with "IMHO"?
> 
> You still don't get it.
> 
> My opinion always is imho, 
> others like you foolishly pretend otherwize.

No, that's not what I believe.  I simply don't think it's necessary
or even helpful to plop "IMHO" everywhere when a discussion that
is all about opinions is underway.

Now, back to the original problem.  Does your solution -- IYHO, if
you like -- meet the requirements as per the original post?  I've
already argued that it does not "reference to the object itself within
the object," and therefore is disqualified.  This seems crystal-clear
to me.  Obviously you can choose to argue that the requirement is
nonsense, but do you agree with my assessment?  Or do you think that
it does meet the original requirements?

  -- Scott

Thread

Refer object within itself Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-26 22:50 +1100
  Re: Refer object within itself Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 04:51 -0800
    Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-02-26 14:15 +0100
  Re: Refer object within itself "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-02-26 16:43 +0100
    Re: Refer object within itself Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-26 19:25 +0100
  Re: Refer object within itself Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-26 19:23 +0100
  Refer object within itself Ram Tobolski <ramtob@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 10:06 -0800
    Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-02-28 23:07 +0100
      Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-02-28 23:23 +0100
        Re: Refer object within itself Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 00:11 +0100
        Re: Refer object within itself Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-02-29 14:49 -0300
          Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-02-29 19:49 +0100
            Re: Refer object within itself Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-01 10:48 -0300
              Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-01 17:22 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-01 15:07 -0300
                Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-01 20:26 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-04 21:53 -0300
                Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-05 14:22 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 10:17 -0800
                Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-06 11:59 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Ram Tobolski <ramtob@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 10:48 -0800
                Re: Refer object within itself Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 19:07 -0800
                Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-07 10:44 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-07 12:54 -0300
                Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-07 17:59 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:44 -0800
                Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-07 22:59 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 17:00 -0800
                Re: Refer object within itself "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-08 10:24 +0100
                Re: Refer object within itself Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 13:03 -0800

csiph-web