Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32979

Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us?
Date Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:09:35 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines 71
Message-ID <5971914.vCaTGLijfX@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <ef8a2a84-de5e-4e9a-89fc-3144b262150c@googlegroups.com> <English-20170407003413@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <qM6dnVMmKJqEinXFnZ2dnUU7-NnNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <3000232.1N4lFRLu8V@PointedEars.de> <dt4kectg2f38cou5k2osbckf62re140c77@4ax.com> <1770281.AAz39kb0Nr@PointedEars.de> <32mkecpokj4lo8bn10egh8tbippi0ndivl@4ax.com>
Reply-To Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8Bit
X-Trace solani.org 1491754175 18208 eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVCiZBxrEC+4/Q3vu4ZLoBUeBwrKldFUi/+Y6fMmc2dmPVQqhPtve/Ih9xPhtZEPM= (9 Apr 2017 16:09:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:09:35 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent KNode/4.14.2
X-NNTP-Posting-Host eJwNyEkBACAIBMBKILBoHA7pH0HnOSZglCsMamMjTr3ghQXupGa9qOlhqDdF+LUq4diZ599+GXoRJw==
Face 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
X-User-ID eJwFwQENADAIAzBL3xkjyAEe/Et46yZognLR1xcC3Gx48r5oPe10bmpRadNFu36i+HD4xq68LQEWQzP9ATlRFO0=
X-Face %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Cancel-Lock sha1:koTD5NUILDNot3nbVVxPC8qXM/E=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:32979

Show key headers only | View raw


John G Harris wrote:

> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
>> John G Harris wrote:
>>> On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:13:57 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>>>RobG wrote:
>>>>^^^^
>>>>Your real name belongs there.
>>>   <snip>
>>> 
>>> I wonder how Thomas would react if there were an article from
>>> Elizabeth R ?
>> 
>> I wonder, when will you stop posting attribution novels,
> 
> When someone invents an attribution format that doesn't have a
> catastrophic design error in it.

Your attribution format has a considerable, if not catastrophic, design 
error in it: It makes discussions harder to read at no real advantage.
 
> As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote :
>> I implore you to apply more critical thinking to *everything* that you
>> read.
> 
> and that includes the justification of the attribution format you,
> Thomas, keep referring to.

Ripping my statements out of context does not help your case either.
 
>> start posting on topic,
> 
> Since when have peoples' preferred cognomens been On Topic here ? 

They have not, so why are you attempting to *discuss* about that?

However, you are deliberately overlooking the fact that this was not the 
only thing that I posted.  Who do you think you can try to fool here?

> Or do you, Thomas, think that everyone must use a name approved by the
> German State ?

(Just do not omit “Nazi” there and you have successfully fulfilled Godwin’s 
Law.)

Not at all.  As I explained to you many times before, it is simply a matter 
of simple politeness, of telling your name to people who do not know you.  

As you are going all nationalistic now, let me put this to you: You are 
British.  It has been my impression so far that you British are proud of 
your politeness, and I appreciate that.  But I fail to see anything of it
in your actions so far.  Why?

>>and stop referring to people whose postings you reply to in the third
>>person?
> 
>   As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote :
>>this is _not_ a chat room.
> 
> My article was addressed to the News Group, not restricted to the
> individual who keeps on writing "Score adjusted".

You delude yourself if you think that anyone reasonable is falling for your 
deception.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-06 16:17 -0700
  Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-07 13:35 +0200
  Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-08 08:47 +1000
    Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-08 20:13 +0200
      Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 11:58 +0100
        Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 15:54 +0200
          Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2017-04-09 16:02 +0200
          Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 16:51 +0100
            Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 18:09 +0200
              Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 10:34 +0100
                Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 06:26 +0200
                Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-11 18:38 +0100
      Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 15:57 +1000
      Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 16:45 +1000
  Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Dr J R Stockton <reply1700@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 21:16 +0100
    Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-04-10 19:15 -0700

csiph-web