Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32979
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? |
| Date | Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:09:35 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Lines | 71 |
| Message-ID | <5971914.vCaTGLijfX@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <ef8a2a84-de5e-4e9a-89fc-3144b262150c@googlegroups.com> <English-20170407003413@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <qM6dnVMmKJqEinXFnZ2dnUU7-NnNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <3000232.1N4lFRLu8V@PointedEars.de> <dt4kectg2f38cou5k2osbckf62re140c77@4ax.com> <1770281.AAz39kb0Nr@PointedEars.de> <32mkecpokj4lo8bn10egh8tbippi0ndivl@4ax.com> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1491754175 18208 eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVCiZBxrEC+4/Q3vu4ZLoBUeBwrKldFUi/+Y6fMmc2dmPVQqhPtve/Ih9xPhtZEPM= (9 Apr 2017 16:09:35 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:09:35 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.14.2 |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwNyEkBACAIBMBKILBoHA7pH0HnOSZglCsMamMjTr3ghQXupGa9qOlhqDdF+LUq4diZ599+GXoRJw== |
| Face | 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 |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQENADAIAzBL3xkjyAEe/Et46yZognLR1xcC3Gx48r5oPe10bmpRadNFu36i+HD4xq68LQEWQzP9ATlRFO0= |
| X-Face | %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:koTD5NUILDNot3nbVVxPC8qXM/E= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:32979 |
Show key headers only | View raw
John G Harris wrote: > […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >> John G Harris wrote: >>> On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:13:57 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>>>RobG wrote: >>>>^^^^ >>>>Your real name belongs there. >>> <snip> >>> >>> I wonder how Thomas would react if there were an article from >>> Elizabeth R ? >> >> I wonder, when will you stop posting attribution novels, > > When someone invents an attribution format that doesn't have a > catastrophic design error in it. Your attribution format has a considerable, if not catastrophic, design error in it: It makes discussions harder to read at no real advantage. > As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote : >> I implore you to apply more critical thinking to *everything* that you >> read. > > and that includes the justification of the attribution format you, > Thomas, keep referring to. Ripping my statements out of context does not help your case either. >> start posting on topic, > > Since when have peoples' preferred cognomens been On Topic here ? They have not, so why are you attempting to *discuss* about that? However, you are deliberately overlooking the fact that this was not the only thing that I posted. Who do you think you can try to fool here? > Or do you, Thomas, think that everyone must use a name approved by the > German State ? (Just do not omit “Nazi” there and you have successfully fulfilled Godwin’s Law.) Not at all. As I explained to you many times before, it is simply a matter of simple politeness, of telling your name to people who do not know you. As you are going all nationalistic now, let me put this to you: You are British. It has been my impression so far that you British are proud of your politeness, and I appreciate that. But I fail to see anything of it in your actions so far. Why? >>and stop referring to people whose postings you reply to in the third >>person? > > As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote : >>this is _not_ a chat room. > > My article was addressed to the News Group, not restricted to the > individual who keeps on writing "Score adjusted". You delude yourself if you think that anyone reasonable is falling for your deception. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-06 16:17 -0700
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-07 13:35 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-08 08:47 +1000
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-08 20:13 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 11:58 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 15:54 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2017-04-09 16:02 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 16:51 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 18:09 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 10:34 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 06:26 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-11 18:38 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 15:57 +1000
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 16:45 +1000
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Dr J R Stockton <reply1700@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 21:16 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-04-10 19:15 -0700
csiph-web