Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32979
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? |
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:09 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <5971914.vCaTGLijfX@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <qM6dnVMmKJqEinXFnZ2dnUU7-NnNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <3000232.1N4lFRLu8V@PointedEars.de> <dt4kectg2f38cou5k2osbckf62re140c77@4ax.com> <1770281.AAz39kb0Nr@PointedEars.de> <32mkecpokj4lo8bn10egh8tbippi0ndivl@4ax.com> |
John G Harris wrote: > […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >> John G Harris wrote: >>> On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:13:57 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>>>RobG wrote: >>>>^^^^ >>>>Your real name belongs there. >>> <snip> >>> >>> I wonder how Thomas would react if there were an article from >>> Elizabeth R ? >> >> I wonder, when will you stop posting attribution novels, > > When someone invents an attribution format that doesn't have a > catastrophic design error in it. Your attribution format has a considerable, if not catastrophic, design error in it: It makes discussions harder to read at no real advantage. > As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote : >> I implore you to apply more critical thinking to *everything* that you >> read. > > and that includes the justification of the attribution format you, > Thomas, keep referring to. Ripping my statements out of context does not help your case either. >> start posting on topic, > > Since when have peoples' preferred cognomens been On Topic here ? They have not, so why are you attempting to *discuss* about that? However, you are deliberately overlooking the fact that this was not the only thing that I posted. Who do you think you can try to fool here? > Or do you, Thomas, think that everyone must use a name approved by the > German State ? (Just do not omit “Nazi” there and you have successfully fulfilled Godwin’s Law.) Not at all. As I explained to you many times before, it is simply a matter of simple politeness, of telling your name to people who do not know you. As you are going all nationalistic now, let me put this to you: You are British. It has been my impression so far that you British are proud of your politeness, and I appreciate that. But I fail to see anything of it in your actions so far. Why? >>and stop referring to people whose postings you reply to in the third >>person? > > As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote : >>this is _not_ a chat room. > > My article was addressed to the News Group, not restricted to the > individual who keeps on writing "Score adjusted". You delude yourself if you think that anyone reasonable is falling for your deception. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-06 16:17 -0700
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-07 13:35 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-08 08:47 +1000
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-08 20:13 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 11:58 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 15:54 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2017-04-09 16:02 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 16:51 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 18:09 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 10:34 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 06:26 +0200
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-11 18:38 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 15:57 +1000
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 16:45 +1000
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Dr J R Stockton <reply1700@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 21:16 +0100
Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-04-10 19:15 -0700
csiph-web