Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #32979

Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us?

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us?
Date 2017-04-09 18:09 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <5971914.vCaTGLijfX@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <qM6dnVMmKJqEinXFnZ2dnUU7-NnNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <3000232.1N4lFRLu8V@PointedEars.de> <dt4kectg2f38cou5k2osbckf62re140c77@4ax.com> <1770281.AAz39kb0Nr@PointedEars.de> <32mkecpokj4lo8bn10egh8tbippi0ndivl@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


John G Harris wrote:

> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
>> John G Harris wrote:
>>> On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:13:57 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>>>RobG wrote:
>>>>^^^^
>>>>Your real name belongs there.
>>>   <snip>
>>> 
>>> I wonder how Thomas would react if there were an article from
>>> Elizabeth R ?
>> 
>> I wonder, when will you stop posting attribution novels,
> 
> When someone invents an attribution format that doesn't have a
> catastrophic design error in it.

Your attribution format has a considerable, if not catastrophic, design 
error in it: It makes discussions harder to read at no real advantage.
 
> As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote :
>> I implore you to apply more critical thinking to *everything* that you
>> read.
> 
> and that includes the justification of the attribution format you,
> Thomas, keep referring to.

Ripping my statements out of context does not help your case either.
 
>> start posting on topic,
> 
> Since when have peoples' preferred cognomens been On Topic here ? 

They have not, so why are you attempting to *discuss* about that?

However, you are deliberately overlooking the fact that this was not the 
only thing that I posted.  Who do you think you can try to fool here?

> Or do you, Thomas, think that everyone must use a name approved by the
> German State ?

(Just do not omit “Nazi” there and you have successfully fulfilled Godwin’s 
Law.)

Not at all.  As I explained to you many times before, it is simply a matter 
of simple politeness, of telling your name to people who do not know you.  

As you are going all nationalistic now, let me put this to you: You are 
British.  It has been my impression so far that you British are proud of 
your politeness, and I appreciate that.  But I fail to see anything of it
in your actions so far.  Why?

>>and stop referring to people whose postings you reply to in the third
>>person?
> 
>   As Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote :
>>this is _not_ a chat room.
> 
> My article was addressed to the News Group, not restricted to the
> individual who keeps on writing "Score adjusted".

You delude yourself if you think that anyone reasonable is falling for your 
deception.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-06 16:17 -0700
  Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-07 13:35 +0200
  Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-08 08:47 +1000
    Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-08 20:13 +0200
      Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 11:58 +0100
        Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 15:54 +0200
          Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2017-04-09 16:02 +0200
          Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-09 16:51 +0100
            Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 18:09 +0200
              Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 10:34 +0100
                Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-11 06:26 +0200
                Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-11 18:38 +0100
      Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 15:57 +1000
      Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2017-04-14 16:45 +1000
  Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Dr J R Stockton <reply1700@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-04-10 21:16 +0100
    Re: Is Date.prototoype.toString always en-us? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2017-04-10 19:15 -0700

csiph-web