Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #39536

Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay?

Show all headers | View raw

måndag 1 mars 2021 kl. 11:07:02 UTC+1 skrev Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
> JJ wrote: 
> 
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 15:58:50 -0800 (PST), Jonas Thörnvall wrote: 
> >> I kind of doubt your counterexample to beleive with but if that is true, 
> >> you make a wrapper. create,thread.wassup(setTimeout); 
> >> release.thread.wassup; 
> > 
> > I get your frustration. Sometimes I loathe JavaScript limitations too. But 
> > what can we do? We can't simply change how JavaScript works.
> Blind leading the blind :-D 
> 
> setTimeout() is NOT a language feature; it is a DOM feature. 
> 
> Although it might not have been intended to be, it evolved into a workaround 
> for the fact that the language is single-threaded. 
> 
> In the meantime, better workarounds have been developed, including threads. 
> 
> So STFU and RTFM: 
> 
> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Workers_API/Using_web_workers>
> -- 
> PointedEars 
> FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> 
> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Ypu are a low IQ moron so fuckoff.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 12:00 -0800
  Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 12:08 -0800
  Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 16:48 +0700
    Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 03:11 -0800
      Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-02-27 11:02 -0800
        Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-28 08:52 -0800
          Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-02-28 09:50 -0800
            Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-28 15:58 -0800
              Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-01 15:06 +0700
                Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-03-01 11:06 +0100
                Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-03-01 08:50 -0800
                Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-02 23:46 +0700
                Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2021-03-03 14:39 +0000
        Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-03-01 00:19 +0100
          Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-01 19:30 +0000

csiph-web