Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #39530
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? |
| Date | 2021-03-01 00:19 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2570219.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <45cd9e94-7313-4447-8a9d-3218be6d4b7fn@googlegroups.com> <nia8j27f2whw.68k2g0ejcbyi.dlg@40tude.net> <e1ac0877-25fa-4f0c-b7a0-ea08fd0e165cn@googlegroups.com> <67cc9459-fae1-4591-af12-37d543bf55fbn@googlegroups.com> |
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 5:11:27 AM UTC-6, jonas.t...@gmail.com > wrote: >> They are fucking funny that is what they are, but someone wanted to put >> his name on coming up with the new syntax, keep pling it boys LoL "I >> created webworkers" LoL It so unbeleivable moronic.... > > What's moronic are your assumptions. […] Do not feed the troll. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 12:00 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 12:08 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 16:48 +0700
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 03:11 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-02-27 11:02 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-28 08:52 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-02-28 09:50 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-02-28 15:58 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-01 15:06 +0700
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-03-01 11:06 +0100
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-03-01 08:50 -0800
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-02 23:46 +0700
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2021-03-03 14:39 +0000
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-03-01 00:19 +0100
Re: Why not fix problem, but instead build a new structure and syntax overlay? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-01 19:30 +0000
csiph-web