Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #37780

Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.252.233.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch!not-for-mail
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing?
Date Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:29:10 +0100
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines 17
Message-ID <4497841.GXAFRqVoOG@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <80da4a1d-ff18-4396-b663-274e3543b19b@googlegroups.com> <0998aa34-4383-45fb-bc1d-b2bb1a74255d@googlegroups.com> <48dd7189-ea29-4106-ab8d-0efe1d1a309d@googlegroups.com> <7e43c5df-0474-436f-ac3d-2e5a40a00d51@googlegroups.com> <4f309408-7eaa-4268-b2b2-f69f267f1408@googlegroups.com> <e6eee77a-ebf3-45dd-ac11-83d4087c8c1f@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8Bit
Injection-Info gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="252.233.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch:178.197.233.252"; logging-data="16154"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org"
User-Agent KNode/4.14.10
Cancel-Lock sha1:FxSnDosT2B7eBLCShp7miogThng=
Face 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
X-Face %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
X-User-ID U2FsdGVkX19d+dieZPX+6v+ToCqB5edUg2KYBZmpgMMaC1WDeMGZ7w==
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:37780

Show key headers only | View raw

Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 at 7:45:59 AM UTC-6, Julio Di Egidio
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 12 November 2019 21:30:24 UTC+1, Michael Haufe (TNO)  wrote:
>> > I could expand on this in detail but it would get... verbose.
>> You should learn to read first, as I have just warned you that is NOT in
>> question.
> 
> This isn't only about you...

Why are you still feeding this troll?  Don’t you have better things to do?
 
-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-11 08:51 -0800
  Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-11 10:54 -0800
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-12 07:09 -0800
      Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-12 12:30 -0800
        Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-11-14 19:29 +0100
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-14 10:40 -0800
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-15 11:09 -0800
            Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-11-16 04:05 +0100
        Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-13 05:45 -0800
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-13 05:53 -0800
            Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-13 10:44 -0800
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-13 10:42 -0800
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-14 08:18 -0800
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-14 09:44 -0800
      Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-15 11:16 -0800
        Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-11-17 15:13 +0000
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-11-13 18:46 +0000

csiph-web