Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing?

From	John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing?
Date	2019-11-13 18:46 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<brjose5364vdmflpas4jb6vimpdp2hqbdc@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	<80da4a1d-ff18-4396-b663-274e3543b19b@googlegroups.com> <0998aa34-4383-45fb-bc1d-b2bb1a74255d@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 10:54:40 -0800 (PST), "Michael Haufe (TNO)"
<tno@thenewobjective.com> wrote:

>On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 10:51:41 AM UTC-6, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> 
>> "Political" issues aside, from a strictly technical point of view I would
>> maintain that object oriented programming (meaning the whole idea) in its
>> essence is *misplaced meta-programming*!
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>
>I would say that BOTH the Functional and Object-Oriented language paradigms are obsolete. In regards to OOAD as a whole, I wouldn't want to make the same claims and I think it should be discussed separately. 
  <snip>

Which objective are you two aiming for : large programs that work, or
programming languages that are more expressive ?

  John

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-11 08:51 -0800
  Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-11 10:54 -0800
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-12 07:09 -0800
      Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-12 12:30 -0800
        Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-11-14 19:29 +0100
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-14 10:40 -0800
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-15 11:09 -0800
            Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-11-16 04:05 +0100
        Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-13 05:45 -0800
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-13 05:53 -0800
            Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-13 10:44 -0800
          Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-13 10:42 -0800
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-14 08:18 -0800
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-11-14 09:44 -0800
      Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2019-11-15 11:16 -0800
        Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-11-17 15:13 +0000
    Re: [OT] Object orientation: is this still a thing? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-11-13 18:46 +0000

csiph-web