Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15607
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Message-ID | <4191624.W6QT1uhmCP@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:20:21 +0200 |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.11 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Face | %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v |
| Face | 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 |
| Subject | Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <88f8c6ba-bc50-4695-b442-10f1dc377363@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <k1lopg$qsm$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Lines | 114 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 29 Aug 2012 22:20:23 CEST |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 954713fe.newsspool3.arcor-online.net |
| X-Trace | DXC==<B<NICc<nm]BlmkiiU@BiMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOk[iUmQ1SdEVmDZm8W4\YJNlb@mF9jNikdea_\Tedi=oJi`9OVM<C[2@f |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet-abuse@arcor.de |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:15607 |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Show key headers only | View raw
BGB wrote:
> On 8/29/2012 1:56 AM, RobG wrote:
>> The syntax for the do..while statement (ECMA-262 12.6.1[1]) is:
>>
>> do /Statement/ while ( /Expression/ );
>>
>> Noting the trailing semicolon, I expected the following to throw an
>> error:
>>
>> do {} while (false) var x = 3;
>>
>> since there is no semicolon to separate the two statements. However,
>> I've tested a number of browsers and no error is thrown. So either the
>> browsers I tested are all tolerant of the error (possible in one or
>> two but unlikely in half a dozen) or automatic semicolon insertion is
>> at work.
>
> maybe?... (speculation here, based partly on my own implementation).
Did you mean _interpretation_? If not, your implementation is borken.
> because some implementations don't actually "insert" semicolons, rather
> they "eat" them (check for semicolon, and if-seen, it is discarded).
> (this would be because it is faster and easier to treat the semicolon as
> a break and then eat it, than it is to figure out how to write logic to
> accurately figure out where to insert them, the "semicolon insertion"
> may then be generally interpreted as "if we may see a semicolon here,
> and see a newline or similar instead, interpret it as if it were a
> semicolon").
>
> but, upon trying to eat the semicolon, there is none there for it to
> eat, so it continues on as normal (and since the do/while statement is
> otherwise self-terminating, it does not lead to an ambiguity).
I realize that you said "maybe?" and "speculation", but still…
Utter nonsense.
What actually happens is very simple:
,-[ECMA-262, 5.1 Edition]
|
| 7.9 Automatic Semicolon Insertion
|
| Certain ECMAScript statements (empty statement, variable statement,
| expression statement, do-while statement, continue statement, break
| statement, return statement, and throw statement) must be terminated with
| semicolons. Such semicolons may always appear explicitly in the source
^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| text. For convenience, however, such semicolons may be omitted from the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| source text in certain situations. These situations are described by
| saying that semicolons are automatically inserted into the source code
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (MUST)
| token stream in those situations.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
IOW,
do {} while (false) var x = 3;
*is* equivalent to
do {} while (false); var x = 3;
because `var' delimits a /VariableStatement/ and the parser is allowed, in
order to produce
/Program/
→ /SourceElements_opt/
→ /SourceElements/ /SourceElement/
→ /SourceElement/ /SourceElement/
→ /Statement/ /Statement/
→ /IterationStatement/ /VariableStatement/
→ do /Statement/ while ( /Expression/ ); /VariableStatement/
→ do /Block/ while ( /Expression/ ); /VariableStatement/
→ …
→ do {} while ( true ); var x = 3;
to insert the semicolon before the /VariableStatement/. It's not a bug,
it's a feature, and a standards-compliant feature at that.
>> But my understanding of automatic semicolon insertion (ECMA-262
>> 7.9[2]) doesn't cover this case.
>>
>> Can someone please explain why no error is thrown and it seems that a
>> semicolon is inserted?
>>
>>
>> 1. http://es5.github.com/#x12.6.1
>> 2. http://es5.github.com/#x7.9
>>
>
> standards are not always interpreted as an exact definition of the
> mechanisms, rather, of their externally perceived interface and behavior.
>
> in edge cases though, one may find things where the behavior of actual
> implementations differs in minor ways from the mechanism which may be
> implied by the wording of a standard (though usually implementations
> will usually try to avoid this where possible).
Again, utter nonsense. Instead, this particular standard gives its
conforming implementations a wide latitude (see "Conformance"); in addition,
some of its implementations are simply not conforming in some features.
See also: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
PointedEars
--
Danny Goodman's books are out of date and teach practices that are
positively harmful for cross-browser scripting.
-- Richard Cornford, cljs, <cife6q$253$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk> (2004)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-29 13:55 -0500
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-29 22:20 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-29 20:02 -0500
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2012-08-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-30 12:37 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 14:24 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-30 15:59 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 16:26 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-30 17:47 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-09-01 11:40 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Dr J R Stockton <reply1235@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-02 19:54 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-30 11:17 -0500
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-30 10:25 -0700
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Dr J R Stockton <reply1235@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-31 23:20 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-31 16:03 -0700
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-29 22:30 +0200
csiph-web