Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #27721

Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements?
Date Sun, 17 May 2015 19:06:55 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines 30
Message-ID <2980697.vKQfN8cljN@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <mj7odj$ejr$1@dont-email.me> <GC-20150516175759@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <2602320.PcnAOMWr9L@PointedEars.de> <mj8pgm$nev$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1975681.PYLPBkoTqA@PointedEars.de> <mjafkr$vol$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Reply-To Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
X-Trace solani.org 1431882577 7897 eJwFwQkBACAIA8BK8mxAHBXpH8E7GIU3nKBjMFLZ0LSHSR/rlU8IqX3OVrwg910ML624HfEBDlYQjQ== (17 May 2015 17:09:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 17 May 2015 17:09:37 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent KNode/4.14.2
X-User-ID eJwNzAEBwCAIBMBKIPBIHHylf4TtAlwYFExHwGNiivL81VLuVIzBm/vOXiy5J2macDmr667XZlnW7PahoP7qA1EiFWQ=
Cancel-Lock sha1:ILbL32MNHNpqLC1FUrf+P/b5QEo=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host eJwFwYEBgDAIA7CX7ApFzoEJ/59g4hR0w+QyX98sGUz85sZBztvUPgD69hwWnaKFR60VJn8OGxCZ
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:27721

Show key headers only | View raw


Joao Rodrigues wrote:

> On 17/05/2015 03:01, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Joao Rodrigues wrote:
>>> There is a good article by Addy Osmani teaching how to chase leaks with
>>> Chrome DevTools [2].
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> <http://addyosmani.com/blog/taming-the-unicorn-easing-javascript-memory->>>
>>> profiling-in-devtools/>
>> Your research is lacking depth.
>>
>> This article was published on 2013-04-11, around the time that Chrome 26
>> was released, which used WebKit as layout engine.  The current stable 
>> Chrome version is 42 and uses a different layout engine, Blink.
> 
> I tested the new tools in my Chrome Version 42.0.2311.152 yesterday. So
> Addy's article still applies to the current stable version.

It applies in the way that the tools are still available, although arranged 
differently.

Whether it applies in the way that there still is the possibility for such 
memory leaks is questionable.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2015-05-16 11:14 -0430
  Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 17:44 +0200
    Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2015-05-16 11:32 -0430
      Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 18:06 +0200
  Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2015-05-16 11:42 -0430
    Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 18:12 +0200
  Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 18:09 +0200
    Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-05-16 22:05 -0300
      Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-17 08:01 +0200
        Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-05-17 13:29 -0300
          Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-17 19:06 +0200
      Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-05-17 11:53 +0200
        Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-05-17 13:20 -0300

csiph-web