Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #34715

Re: A simpler DOM in JS

Show key headers only | View raw

Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
>> > The ghost of XSLT+XML come back to haunt us?
>> You do not know what you are talking about.  XSLT rulez (see the FAQ).
> 
> Ha, you don't need to convince me. I've commited XSLT sins in the past for
> the hell of it: <view-source:http://ht2012.org/index.xml>

:)
 
>> [Android layout XML] 
> 
> While I like the declarative nature, the use of layout containers I find
> iffy. How you do manage dynamic layouts?

Depends.  “Dynamic” as in…?

> Validation the most important aspect IMO. It's a damned shame this was
> thrown away in HTML5 in preference for hand-wavery:
> 
> <https://github.com/validator/validator/issues/251#issuecomment-192209209>

Hmmm.  HTML5 validation is actually more strict than HTML < 5 validation, 
enabled by a grammar that is algorithmic instead of declarative.  But this 
also makes it more difficult to implement.

XHTML5 is only XML in name as HTML5 is by design and specification the 
antithesis to XHTML (unspecified elements and attributes are allowed, the 
latter are even encouraged with “data-…” attributes, SVG and MathML can be 
embedded without declaration), so I can understand the lack of desire to 
specify a schema for it.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-03 14:24 -0800
  Re: A simpler DOM in JS Martin Honnen <martin.honnen@gmx.de> - 2018-02-04 14:26 +0100
    Re: A simpler DOM in JS Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-02-04 06:18 -0800
      Re: A simpler DOM in JS Ken Tilton <kentilton@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:14 -0800
        Re: A simpler DOM in JS Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-03-08 00:43 -0800
          Re: A simpler DOM in JS Ken Tilton <kentilton@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 05:57 -0800
            Re: A simpler DOM in JS Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-03-08 07:56 -0800
    Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-05 06:15 +0100
      Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-04 23:15 -0800
    Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-04 23:06 -0800
  Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-05 05:50 +0100
    Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-05 06:26 +0100
      Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-04 23:33 -0800
        Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-05 11:19 +0100
          Re: A simpler DOM in JS Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-02-05 04:16 -0800
          Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-05 10:23 -0800
            Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-05 19:42 +0100
              Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-08 01:46 +0100
              Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-08 01:47 +0100
                Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-11 10:27 -0800
                Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-12 04:38 +0100
                Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-15 12:19 -0800
                Re: A simpler DOM in JS Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-02-15 12:43 -0800
                Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-25 19:22 +0100
              Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-07 12:51 -0800
                Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-08 02:27 +0100
                Re: A simpler DOM in JS John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-02-08 19:21 +0000
            Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-05 19:58 +0100
    Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-04 23:30 -0800
      Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-05 19:11 +0100
        Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-02-11 10:16 -0800
          Re: A simpler DOM in JS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-02-12 04:48 +0100
  Re: A simpler DOM in JS Ken Tilton <kentilton@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:07 -0800
    Re: A simpler DOM in JS "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-03-06 17:40 -0800
      Re: A simpler DOM in JS Ken Tilton <kentilton@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 12:09 -0800

csiph-web