Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30371
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? |
| Date | Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:29:07 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <1883569.FeaefMiEB4@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <f34d1e4b-3958-4635-94bc-3f06c89486bc@googlegroups.com> <nfn3hd$htf$1@dont-email.me> <d9u5u561foam.1nkzd11bm9nvy.dlg@40tude.net> <2507561.Om0TlvYDvz@PointedEars.de> <165xttxngz2tw$.153gbq3rd98pc.dlg@40tude.net> <nfq0no$fnt$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1461785348 27041 eJwFwQEBACAIA7BKgPxKHa70j+CGRad2EkwMxg2mU/14d8mVQ8xhVLyb8gzhrd7CVJ8w/xZZENs= (27 Apr 2016 19:29:08 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:29:08 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.14.2 |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BNK5CmcvjiX8LuwvChryPgodALX8sbD5yP6V0SSdC8HjTbGqMugW7tGXqOHdvsY6X6AV2jFn4= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:wBg0ckLi1RPdmzlZLL6yEn4xp/A= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXQGmZ5xSR/09Ygk3nzSAYGMyaQT3z6qM3IUXntrxWelTysMBvkUh3b/01IBFZ |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:30371 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Stefan Weiss wrote: > JJ wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:49:49 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> insertAdjacentHTML() is proprietary, inefficient, and error-prone; and >>> it is obsolete since IE/MSHTML 5. >> >> True, but Chromium and Firefox support it regardless. You should tell >> them that. >> >> Efficiency and flawlessness would depend on the implementation, not the >> function specifications. >> >> And IE still support it until its last version. Surely you meant Edge >> instead of IE? > > Edge and IE both support it (as do all of the other major browsers). I > can't find any indication that this method has ever been marked as > obsolete. It is obsolete since IE/MSHTML 5 because IE/MSHTML 5 supports the W3C DOM. So do other browsers. > It doesn't look particularly inefficient or error-prone to me. Then you should have your eyes checked. It is eval() and innerHTML in disguise: the second argument is a *string* of *markup* that needs to be *parsed* first. Not so with appendChild(). -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2016-04-25 23:09 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 09:01 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-04-26 19:05 +0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-26 17:49 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-04-27 12:14 +0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:28 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:29 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 13:07 +0100
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-04-27 06:41 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-04-27 15:52 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-04-27 10:57 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-04-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-04-27 10:48 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 20:19 +0100
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:42 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:33 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:44 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 22:30 +0100
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2016-04-30 05:48 -0700
csiph-web