Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30360
| From | Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? |
| Date | 2016-04-27 11:28 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <nfq0no$fnt$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <f34d1e4b-3958-4635-94bc-3f06c89486bc@googlegroups.com> <nfn3hd$htf$1@dont-email.me> <d9u5u561foam.1nkzd11bm9nvy.dlg@40tude.net> <2507561.Om0TlvYDvz@PointedEars.de> <165xttxngz2tw$.153gbq3rd98pc.dlg@40tude.net> |
JJ wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:49:49 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> >> insertAdjacentHTML() is proprietary, inefficient, and error-prone; and it is >> obsolete since IE/MSHTML 5. > > True, but Chromium and Firefox support it regardless. You should tell them > that. > > Efficiency and flawlessness would depend on the implementation, not the > function specifications. > > And IE still support it until its last version. Surely you meant Edge > instead of IE? Edge and IE both support it (as do all of the other major browsers). I can't find any indication that this method has ever been marked as obsolete. It doesn't look particularly inefficient or error-prone to me. Interesting to see such unsubstantiated claims from someone who frequently insists that others have to "cite evidence". - stefan
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2016-04-25 23:09 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 09:01 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-04-26 19:05 +0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-26 17:49 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-04-27 12:14 +0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:28 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:29 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 13:07 +0100
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-04-27 06:41 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-04-27 15:52 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-04-27 10:57 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-04-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-04-27 10:48 -0700
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 20:19 +0100
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:42 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:33 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-27 21:44 +0200
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 22:30 +0100
Re: Is there such a thing as AppendSibling? bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2016-04-30 05:48 -0700
csiph-web