Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36414 > unrolled thread

Re: What is left alive?

Started by"Tristan B. Kildaire" <deavmi@disroot.org>
First post2017-03-22 19:25 +0200
Last post2017-03-22 20:11 -0400
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: What is left alive? "Tristan B. Kildaire" <deavmi@disroot.org> - 2017-03-22 19:25 +0200
    Re: What is left alive? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-03-22 20:11 -0400

#36414 — Re: What is left alive?

From"Tristan B. Kildaire" <deavmi@disroot.org>
Date2017-03-22 19:25 +0200
SubjectRe: What is left alive?
Message-ID<oauc32$c63$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On 2016-11-30 02:05 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>   So, they say
>
>       - Java applets are dead
>       - Java on the desktop is dead
>
>   So, what is still alive?
>
>       - Java on the server (JEE)
>       - Java on Android
>
>   Anything else?
>
>   Maybe
>
>       - Java as a teaching language
>
>   But maybe Python is threatening Java as a teaching
>   language?
>
>   Is Node.js a threat on the server?
>
>   And Java on Android is not real Java (it is not Java SE, no
>   AWT, no Swing, no JavaFX). (Yes, IIRC there is a project to
>   bring JavaFX to Android, why does Oracle not do this more
>   aggressively bringing a JDK for Android?)
>
Java is a great teaching language, I'd say. Python is good too but not 
as good a Java. Python to me is too messy as it tries to be simple but 
keep other features, hence to me it feels unstructured.

I don't know what industry says but I love Java.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#36419

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2017-03-22 20:11 -0400
Message-ID<oav3rs$1tjr$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#36414
On 3/22/2017 1:25 PM, Tristan B. Kildaire wrote:
> Java is a great teaching language, I'd say. Python is good too but not
> as good a Java. Python to me is too messy as it tries to be simple but
> keep other features, hence to me it feels unstructured.

All sort of languages are used in teaching including Java and
Python.

If we follow the stereotype (which is far from everyone) then
I would expect:

business - Java and/or C#
science - Python and/or R
theoretical CS - OCAML and/or Haskell
hardware - C

But I suspect that exceptions are the majority.

:-)

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer


csiph-web