Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36419

Re: What is left alive?

From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: What is left alive?
Date	2017-03-22 20:11 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<oav3rs$1tjr$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<Java-20161130005914@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <oauc32$c63$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/22/2017 1:25 PM, Tristan B. Kildaire wrote:
> Java is a great teaching language, I'd say. Python is good too but not
> as good a Java. Python to me is too messy as it tries to be simple but
> keep other features, hence to me it feels unstructured.

All sort of languages are used in teaching including Java and
Python.

If we follow the stereotype (which is far from everyone) then
I would expect:

business - Java and/or C#
science - Python and/or R
theoretical CS - OCAML and/or Haskell
hardware - C

But I suspect that exceptions are the majority.

:-)

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: What is left alive? "Tristan B. Kildaire" <deavmi@disroot.org> - 2017-03-22 19:25 +0200
  Re: What is left alive? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-03-22 20:11 -0400

csiph-web