Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34471 > unrolled thread

Re: Why is it called "default constructor"?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why is it called "default constructor"? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-06-04 15:34 -0400

#34471 — Re: Why is it called "default constructor"?

On 6/4/2016 1:39 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>   When a constructor is implicitly declared, it often has no
>   parameters and it often is called »default constructor«.
>
>   »Default« means »used when something is missing«.
>
>   So, why is it called »default constructor«?
>
>   A - Because it has no parameters and therefore it is
>       used when /arguments/ are missing.
>
>   B - Because it is implicitly declared and therefore it is
>       used when an /explicit declaration/ is missing
>
>   ?

#B is the terminology in Java.

#A is the terminology in C++.

I would use the term according to the above, but when
seeing the term I would be aware that it could have
the other meaning.

Arne

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web