Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34471

Re: Why is it called "default constructor"?

From Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Why is it called "default constructor"?
Date 2016-06-04 15:34 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nivagu$14oh$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <default-constructor-20160604183650@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/4/2016 1:39 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>   When a constructor is implicitly declared, it often has no
>   parameters and it often is called »default constructor«.
>
>   »Default« means »used when something is missing«.
>
>   So, why is it called »default constructor«?
>
>   A - Because it has no parameters and therefore it is
>       used when /arguments/ are missing.
>
>   B - Because it is implicitly declared and therefore it is
>       used when an /explicit declaration/ is missing
>
>   ?

#B is the terminology in Java.

#A is the terminology in C++.

I would use the term according to the above, but when
seeing the term I would be aware that it could have
the other meaning.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Why is it called "default constructor"? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-06-04 15:34 -0400

csiph-web