Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27561 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "jay'el antonio" <jlantonio10@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-02-20 16:03 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-03-01 19:52 +0000 |
| Articles | 13 on this page of 53 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
java code "jay'el antonio" <jlantonio10@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 16:03 -0800
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-21 14:29 +0100
Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 01:10 -0600
Re: java code Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-22 12:36 +0100
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 13:57 +0100
Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 12:05 -0600
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 20:02 +0100
Re: java code Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-23 00:52 -0800
Re: java code Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-02-21 08:55 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-23 09:25 +0000
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 20:47 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-24 09:06 +0000
Re: java code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-02-24 19:23 -0500
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-25 09:22 +0000
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 15:08 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 08:47 +0000
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-25 03:56 -0600
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-25 14:54 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 09:07 +0000
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:40 +0100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 14:54 +0000
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 16:10 +0100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 15:45 +0000
Re: java code Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +0100
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:48 +0100
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-27 09:49 -0600
Re: java code Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-02-27 19:24 +0100
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:53 -0800
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-28 16:10 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:36 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 20:51 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:31 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:44 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:49 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:58 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:00 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:36 +1100
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:59 -0800
Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-02-28 20:42 -0500
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:58 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:00 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:45 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 22:04 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:13 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:05 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 08:57 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 22:02 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 11:57 +0000
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-03-02 06:57 -0600
Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-03-02 15:21 -0500
Re: java code rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2014-02-26 22:06 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +1100
Re: java code v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2014-03-01 19:52 +0000
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-01 21:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lesb6c$b2v$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #27627 |
"lipska the kat" wrote in message news:2tidncX0ksO_PIzOnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@bt.com... >> Even if you dislike the smartass answers, you shouldn't be answering >> people's homework questions for them. > > Why? Yep, gotta agree with you on this one Kitty. Why *shouldn't* we do their homework for them? Clearly they are incapable of doing it for themselves. And if they fail, they may never get a job. And if people like this never got jobs, who would you have on your team to make you look good? And anyway, if we don't do it for them then I am sure they can find a solution from some other group, someone else or copy off their mates. Why put the poor dears through all that stress? And when they are presented with the solution I am absolutely sure that they will go over it with a fine-toothed comb and learn every aspect of software development embodied in the code. Clearly helping such people is a "win win". I get to show how smart I am and they become the world's best programmer as a result. W00t! -- And loving it, -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) _________________________________________________ Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-01 10:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <_NydnQqstcPeJ4zOnZ2dnUVZ8hGdnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #27630 |
On 01/03/14 10:00, Qu0ll wrote: > "lipska the kat" wrote in message > news:2tidncX0ksO_PIzOnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@bt.com... > >>> Even if you dislike the smartass answers, you shouldn't be answering >>> people's homework questions for them. >> >> Why? > > Yep, gotta agree with you on this one Kitty. Why *shouldn't* we do their > homework for them? Hello again, still cranking up the irritant factor eh, OK, IPOTY 2014 is only 8 months away. Actually, it can be a real turning point for some, who are obviously not as clever as you, to see a solution to a problem that they don't have a clue about how to solve. Just the experience of actually getting something to compile and produce the expected output can inspire someone to actually get their head around how this works. How do I know ... I've seen it many times before, help someone over that first hurdle and they are away. Did you read the bit where I said I'd give anyone the benefit of the doubt ... once. Clearly you have never had to ask for help as you are so incredibly clever and can learn an entire language simply by glancing at a Hello World example. Unfortunately many others are not so fortunate and need a bit of a push to get them going. Is that OK? <snip> > Clearly helping such people is a "win win". I get to show how smart I > am and they become the world's best programmer as a result. W00t! Oh gosh, I've been found out, what other reason could there possibly be? Qu0ll says so so it must be right. > > -- > And loving it, > > -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) > _________________________________________________ > Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com > [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me] -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer, treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-01 22:04 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <leset6$9q$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #27633 |
"lipska the kat" wrote in message news:_NydnQqstcPeJ4zOnZ2dnUVZ8hGdnZ2d@bt.com... > Clearly you have never had to ask for help as you are so incredibly clever > and can learn an entire language simply by glancing at a Hello World > example. Not true. The "Hello" example is usually sufficient. > Unfortunately many others are not so fortunate and need a bit of a push to > get them going. Push? You classify spoon-feeding an answer as a "push". Or are you actually in the habit of physically "pushing" anyone who is "not so fortunate"? > Is that OK? Yes, I have not problems accepting that there are others not so fortunate. > Oh gosh, I've been found out, what other reason could there possibly be? Umm... none actually. > Qu0ll says so so it must be right. At least you exhibit a willingness and fair ability to learn. -- And loving it, -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) _________________________________________________ Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-01 12:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pO6dnQ9li4R-U4zOnZ2dnUVZ8r6dnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #27636 |
On 01/03/14 11:04, Qu0ll wrote: > "lipska the kat" wrote in message > news:_NydnQqstcPeJ4zOnZ2dnUVZ8hGdnZ2d@bt.com... > >> Clearly you have never had to ask for help as you are so incredibly >> clever and can learn an entire language simply by glancing at a Hello >> World example. > > Not true. The "Hello" example is usually sufficient. What is not true? you're making even less sense than normal. 1. You have never had to ask for help. 2. You are incredibly clever 3. You can learn an entire language etc etc >> Unfortunately many others are not so fortunate and need a bit of a >> push to get them going. > > Push? You classify spoon-feeding an answer as a "push". Or are you > actually in the habit of physically "pushing" anyone who is "not so > fortunate"? I thought that might be a bit too subtle for you. >> Is that OK? > > Yes, I have not problems accepting that there are others not so fortunate. I know, it's hard when you are so far above everyone else in ability to drag yourself down to their level but keep trying, you'll get there in the end. >> Oh gosh, I've been found out, what other reason could there possibly be? > > Umm... none actually. How about altruism ... oh, hold on, that implies selflessness, no, sorry, my mistake. You have already admitted that you confuse altruism with egoism so I can't expect you to make that leap, it's still early days and you still have a great deal to learn. > >> Qu0ll says so so it must be right. > > At least you exhibit a willingness and fair ability to learn. Are you American? > > -- > And loving it, > > -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) > _________________________________________________ > Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com > [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me] -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer, treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 11:05 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <letskg$p4d$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #27638 |
"lipska the kat" wrote in message news:pO6dnQ9li4R-U4zOnZ2dnUVZ8r6dnZ2d@bt.com... >>> Clearly you have never had to ask for help as you are so incredibly >>> clever and can learn an entire language simply by glancing at a Hello >>> World example. >> >> Not true. The "Hello" example is usually sufficient. > > What is not true? you're making even less sense than normal. > 1. You have never had to ask for help. > 2. You are incredibly clever > 3. You can learn an entire language etc etc Gosh, I didn't realise it was going to be so difficult to explain things to you Puss. You do understand Boolean Algebra don't you? When you evaluate a Boolean expression, the fact that it may evaluate to "false" (as in my statement "Not true" which implies "false") there may be a number of reasons why. So, I was indicating that your Boolean expression evaluated to "false". I even gave the reason. Which part is not making sense as you put it? > I thought that might be a bit too subtle for you. Oh, so it's a "subtle" push then? Still grounds for dismissal in most places where I have worked ;-) > I know, it's hard when you are so far above everyone else in ability to > drag yourself down to their level but keep trying, you'll get there in the > end. Well, like you, they usually try to drag *me* down. > How about altruism ... oh, hold on, that implies selflessness, no, sorry, > my mistake. You have already admitted that you confuse altruism with > egoism so I can't expect you to make that leap, it's still early days and > you still have a great deal to learn. Wow, please quote my exact words where I "already admitted that you confuse altruism with egoism" because I am not seeing it. > Are you American? No, I am a rare, carnivorous native Australian marsupial. Not sure why that's important BTW. -- And loving it, -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) _________________________________________________ Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 08:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9b6dndLs3YIYb4_OnZ2dnUVZ7qOdnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #27644 |
On 02/03/14 00:05, Qu0ll wrote: > "lipska the kat" wrote in message > news:pO6dnQ9li4R-U4zOnZ2dnUVZ8r6dnZ2d@bt.com... <snip> >> How about altruism ... oh, hold on, that implies selflessness, no, >> sorry, my mistake. You have already admitted that you confuse altruism >> with egoism so I can't expect you to make that leap, it's still early >> days and you still have a great deal to learn. > > Wow, please quote my exact words where I "already admitted that you > confuse altruism with egoism" because I am not seeing it. You're hard work aren't you? Oh well, in for a penny etc You said "Clearly helping such people is a "win win". I get to show how smart I am and they become the world's best programmer as a result." I said "Oh gosh, I've been found out, what other reason could there possibly be?" Do you understand irony? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Irony: the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Obviously not, as you then said "Umm... none actually" Do you see it yet? no, OK, step by step then The "I get to show how smart I am" bit implies egoism on my part but it could also be seen as altruism ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Altruism: feelings and behavior that show a desire to help other people and a lack of selfishness. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I consider my response to the OP to be altruistic, you consider it egoism ergo you are confusing altruism with egoism. Does that make sense now? >> Are you American? > > No, I am a rare, carnivorous native Australian marsupial. Oh you're *Australian* that explains the negativity, convicts often blame the rest of the world for their predicament. > Not sure why > that's important BTW. See above re irony -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer, treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 22:02 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lev35p$5o0$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #27647 |
"lipska the kat" wrote in message news:9b6dndLs3YIYb4_OnZ2dnUVZ7qOdnZ2d@bt.com... > You're hard work aren't you? Oh well, in for a penny etc <snip> > Does that make sense now? No. In fact your argument is about as bulletproof as someone proving their job of removing elephants from the train tunnels of London is effective because not one elephant has been spotted there for over a century. But I am sure everyone appreciates how much effort you have put into formulating that flimsy argument and how much effort you regularly put into discrediting Lew or me or anyone else whose intelligence, knowledge or skills intimidate you. >>> Are you American? >> >> No, I am a rare, carnivorous native Australian marsupial. > > Oh you're *Australian* that explains the negativity, convicts often blame > the rest of the world for their predicament. Right, so you are not only a troll but also a racist. You first refer to Americans and now make racist remarks about Australians. What's next in your xenophobic kit bag, some reference to Jews and or Godwin's Law? On the basis of you exposing yourself as a bottom feeder, I will no longer reply to any of your posts in this thread or any other unless you limit your commentary to issues relating to Java or at the very least refrain from any such totally unacceptable comments as those made by you in this post. -- And loving it, -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) _________________________________________________ Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 11:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5dmdna3sVJIJgY7OnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #27648 |
On 02/03/14 11:02, Qu0ll wrote: > "lipska the kat" wrote in message > news:9b6dndLs3YIYb4_OnZ2dnUVZ7qOdnZ2d@bt.com... > >> You're hard work aren't you? Oh well, in for a penny etc > > <snip> > >> Does that make sense now? > > No. In fact your argument is about as bulletproof as someone proving > their job of removing elephants from the train tunnels of London is > effective because not one elephant has been spotted there for over a > century. But I am sure everyone appreciates how much effort you have > put into formulating that flimsy argument and how much effort you > regularly put into discrediting Lew or me or anyone else whose > intelligence, knowledge or skills intimidate you. Oh dear, you're getting upset now ... touched a nerve have we. >>>> Are you American? >>> >>> No, I am a rare, carnivorous native Australian marsupial. >> >> Oh you're *Australian* that explains the negativity, convicts often >> blame the rest of the world for their predicament. > > Right, so you are not only a troll but also a racist. Ah racism, the last resort of the desperate. If you had ever experienced true racism you wouldn't class such a harmless comment as such ... ever called an Englishman a "Pommie"? If so you are a racist, but only by your own slightly skewed view of the world. > You first refer > to Americans Americans anecdotally don't get irony. The irony of that totally escapes you I see. > and now make racist remarks about Australians. What's next > in your xenophobic kit bag, some reference to Jews and or Godwin's Law? I'll ignore that, it's below even you, I'll put it down to your frustration at being consistently and profoundly wrong about so many things. > On the basis of you exposing yourself as a bottom feeder, I will no > longer reply to any of your posts in this thread or any other unless you > limit your commentary to issues relating to Java or at the very least > refrain from any such totally unacceptable comments as those made by you > in this post. I agree, any value there might have been in this exchange has now been negated by your descent into insult and name calling, e.g troll, racist, bottom feeder etc. Disappointing but sadly predictable -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer, treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 06:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <1b2dnbXv09gqt47OnZ2dnUVZ8tCdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #27648 |
Qu0ll <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> wrote: > > On the basis of you exposing yourself as a bottom feeder, I will no longer > reply to any of your posts in this thread or any other unless you limit your > commentary to issues relating to Java or at the very least refrain from any > such totally unacceptable comments as those made by you in this post. Much obliged. There's little enough Java discussion in the group as is. We wouldn't want to replace it with incessant trolling and counter-trolling. So, thank you. -- Leif Roar Moldskred
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 15:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lf03so$jpe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #27627 |
On 01/03/2014 3:58 AM, lipska the kat wrote: >> Even if you dislike the smartass answers, you shouldn't be answering >> people's homework questions for them. > > Why? For one thing, he or she probably attends an institution with an Academic Integrity code that forbids them asking people to solve their homework problems, so you're likely helping someone who is being deliberately dishonest from the beginning. I suspect he or she has access to instructors, teaching assistants, and tutors who can spend one-on-one time leading him or her to the right insights into solving the problem without actually giving away the whole answer. Someone *might* be able to do such a thing online, and IIRC someone upthread tried to do so, but face-to-face is usually faster and more effective because it's easier to clue in to what's confusing the student. As to your comment upthread that people can gain insight from seeing a solution, that may well happen *occasionally* but in my experience that's much rarer than a student simply copying the answer and being totally unable to cope with similar questions in the future, which is the opposite of your intent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-26 22:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <loosg9log4odcaqqbhfab73c7ngtm601cm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #27561 |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:03:51 -0800 (PST), "jay'el antonio" <jlantonio10@gmail.com> wrote: >please someone help me..what is the code of this output program using java >11 >221 >3321 >44321 >554321 >6654321 >77654321 >887654321 There are an extremely large number of possible programs. It is not difficult, with a little thought, to find one of those many programs for yourself. Here are some things to think about: 1) Each line after the first is one character longer than the previous line. What is the extra character that is added at the right hand end of the previous line to extend it? Can you write a method that takes a string and adds the required additional character to it? 2) Now look at the first part of each string (after the first line), before the additional character. How is it derived from the previous line? Can you write a method that takes a string and transforms it so it looks like the first part of the next line? 3) Now think about how to combine the two methods from 1) and 2) into a program to produce your desired output, given a starting string and how many lines you want to produce. 4) Code you program. 5) Test your program. You will almost certainly find errors. Fix the errors and retest. Repeat until your program is working correctly. 6) If you want me to write your program for you, my rates are $300 per hour. rossum
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-27 14:01 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lem9rb$9au$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #27607 |
"rossum" wrote in message news:loosg9log4odcaqqbhfab73c7ngtm601cm@4ax.com... > 6) If you want me to write your program for you, my rates are $300 per > hour. I hope that's your discounted rate for helping students. I personally don't get out of bed for less than $10,000 per day ;-) -- And loving it, -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) _________________________________________________ Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-01 19:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <letdqi$nda$1@Gaia.teknon.de> |
| In reply to | #27561 |
jay'el antonio wrote: > please someone help me..what is the code of this output program using java > 11 > 221 > 3321 > 44321 > 554321 > 6654321 > 77654321 > 887654321 please do your homework yourself -- "I'm a doctor, not a mechanic." Dr Leonard McCoy <mccoy@ncc1701.starfleet.fed> "I'm a mechanic, not a doctor." Volker Borchert <v_borchert@despammed.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web