Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25901 > unrolled thread

Naming conventions for Interface + Implementation classes?

Started byrob@wenger.net (Robin Wenger)
First post2011-02-03 09:14 +0000
Last post2011-02-03 09:14 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  Naming conventions for Interface + Implementation classes? rob@wenger.net (Robin Wenger) - 2011-02-03 09:14 +0000

#25901 — Naming conventions for Interface + Implementation classes?

Fromrob@wenger.net (Robin Wenger)
Date2011-02-03 09:14 +0000
SubjectNaming conventions for Interface + Implementation classes?
Message-ID<4d4a71ec$0$6777$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
As I noticed there are two different naming conventions for an Interface+Implementation pair:

1.)  MyClass (=Interface) + MyClassImpl (=Implementation)

or

2.)  IMyClass (=Interface) + MyClass (=Implementation)  

The first one is (AFAIK) from Sun  Who defined originally the second one?

What is recommended (for which scenario)?
  
Robin

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web