Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25901
| From | rob@wenger.net (Robin Wenger) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Naming conventions for Interface + Implementation classes? |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.java.help |
| Date | 2011-02-03 09:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4d4a71ec$0$6777$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | Arcor |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.help
As I noticed there are two different naming conventions for an Interface+Implementation pair: 1.) MyClass (=Interface) + MyClassImpl (=Implementation) or 2.) IMyClass (=Interface) + MyClass (=Implementation) The first one is (AFAIK) from Sun Who defined originally the second one? What is recommended (for which scenario)? Robin
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Naming conventions for Interface + Implementation classes? rob@wenger.net (Robin Wenger) - 2011-02-03 09:14 +0000
csiph-web