Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #29055 > unrolled thread

Re: ant and -bootclasspath

Started bycbmarb@gmail.com
First post2014-07-11 07:29 -0700
Last post2014-07-11 07:29 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: ant and -bootclasspath cbmarb@gmail.com - 2014-07-11 07:29 -0700

#29055 — Re: ant and -bootclasspath

Fromcbmarb@gmail.com
Date2014-07-11 07:29 -0700
SubjectRe: ant and -bootclasspath
Message-ID<1bd5dcbd-70f9-4a53-a48e-18170d6c786d@googlegroups.com>
If you are still looking for a solution...

I came across this issue as well trying to use -Xmaxerrs 500

Here is my workaround:

<compilerarg value="-Xmaxerrs"/>
<compilerarg value="500"/>

So for your case, I guess you would have:

<compilerarg value="-Xbootclasspath" />
<compilerarg value="E:/Program"/>
<compilerarg value="Files/Java/jdk1.7.0_02/jre/lib/rt.jar" />

On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:24:10 PM UTC-5, Lew wrote:
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:24:42 PM UTC-8, Roedy Green wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:05:22 -0800 (PST), Lew <lewb...@gmail.com>
> 
> > wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
> 
> > 
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Or presumably because you haven't read the documentation and specified the 
> 
> >> option correctly.  It's amazing what you can accomplish when you read the 
> 
> >> manual.
> 
> >  
> 
> > This is not useful information to anyone.  Why do you bother?
> 
> 
> 
> Since you ask, because you set yourself up as some sort of authority and 
> 
> champion of the newbie, but how can anyone trust the information you post when 
> 
> you so adamantly refuse to use even the most elementary documentation?  I call 
> 
> shenanigans on you for that.
> 
> 
> 
> Whence do you derive the authority to speak of Java matters?  You act so very 
> 
> offended whenever I suggest that one read the documents.  "You have to be a 
> 
> 'language lawyer'."  "That information isn't useful."
> 
> 
> 
> Well, if the documentation for the product that contains in the obvious place 
> 
> the very answer to the question you ask is not useful, then what, pray tell, 
> 
> O Wise Champion of the Newbie, is?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Lew

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer


csiph-web