Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24674
| From | Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: multiple inheritance in Java |
| Date | 2013-07-05 22:31 -0600 |
| Organization | bilaterally symmetric |
| Message-ID | <ydn1u7cz4up.fsf@shell.xmission.com> (permalink) |
| References | <multiple-inheritance-20130702024630@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ydnip0pyow1.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <51d735f9$0$304$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ydn61wozln4.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <51d778a2$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> writes: > On 7/5/2013 6:29 PM, Jim Janney wrote: >> Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> writes: >> >>> On 7/5/2013 12:04 PM, Jim Janney wrote: >>>> On the other hand, and this is probably more important, the Java >>>> community sets great store on always doing things the usual way, and >>>> this has turned into a strength for the language: you can pull a >>>> third-party library library into a project and expect that it will work >>>> with and follow the same conventions as the rest of the code. There are >>>> languages that encourage the programmer to express his or her >>>> individuality (Lisp comes to mind). Java is not one of them. >>> >>> That is somewhat true. >>> >>> Java is primarily used in business programming. You need millions >>> of Java programmers and that means that you will get some very good, >>> a lot of acceptable and some complete hopeless. And the type >>> of applications are often semi-important (no one will die if the >>> application does not work but some one may lose money if the >>> application does not work). In that context it is important that >>> Java code written by mediocre programmers actually work. So the >>> Java language is kept reasonable simple, framework are often >>> pretty strict and there is a lot of emphasis on following >>> all the conventions. Maybe a bit boring. Bit usually it works. >> >> I was simplifying, of course, but yes: those are the very qualities that >> have led to the success of Java in business programming. Not a niche >> that I think anyone expected it to find, but in hindsight it makes >> sense. > > And hard to call business programming a niche. > > I would expect it to be the majority of programming. In terms of lines of code and total programmer-hours expended, that may well be true. Call it a large niche :-) -- Jim Janney
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-07-05 10:04 -0600
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-07-05 11:17 -0600
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-05 17:10 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 12:26 -0700
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-07-05 16:22 -0600
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-05 21:52 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-05 17:09 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-07-05 16:29 -0600
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-05 21:53 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-07-05 22:31 -0600
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-07-18 22:48 -0300
csiph-web