Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #29899
| From | Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute |
| Date | 2014-09-04 07:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnm0g5vt.ek1.fredrik@biggles.jonson.org> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnm0ejqn.fp3.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <FkINv.112212$Rp.98491@fx23.iad> |
Wayne wrote: > On 9/3/2014 1:26 PM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > > > I wonder, if there is [...] a way to negotiate a bidirectional channel > > between a client and the server that doesn't involve creating pipe nodes > > in the filesystem. > > > > The client is non-Java, but otherwise quite flexible. > > > > I don't want to use inet sockets (not even localhost), because not every > > user on that machine should be able to connect, and I don't want to > > stick any authorization stuff into the protocol. > > A simpler solution may be to use ZeroMQ: > <http://zeromq.org/bindings:java> Zeromq does not solve the OP:s original problem. Yes, Zeromq provides non-socket based in process communication in the native (c language) implementation. But if you want to use Zeromq to communicate between separate processes you need to add connectors that use ordinary internet sockets or domain sockets. Note that the pure java implementation of ZeroMQ even routes in process communication (ipc://) over tcp sockets internally. https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq -- Fredrik Jonson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-03 17:26 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-09-03 13:36 -0400
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2014-09-04 07:42 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-04 07:52 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Josip Almasi <joe@vrspace.org> - 2014-09-04 09:45 +0200
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-04 09:14 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Josip Almasi <joe@vrspace.org> - 2014-09-05 10:20 +0200
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2014-09-04 08:34 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 01:06 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2014-09-04 11:35 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-04 15:11 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2014-09-04 15:57 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-04 16:21 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 10:55 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute (SOLVED) Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 00:53 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute (SOLVED) Josip Almasi <joe@vrspace.org> - 2014-09-05 10:23 +0200
csiph-web