Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #29911
| From | "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <slrnm0ejqn.fp3.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <HI2dnY_1ser57pXJnZ2dnUVZ8m6dnZ2d@bt.com> <c6rcvjF60t0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Subject | Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute |
| Date | 2014-09-04 16:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <E6-dnROl_ruyH5XJnZ2dnUVZ8n0AAAAA@bt.com> (permalink) |
Nigel Wade wrote:
> On 04/09/14 15:11, Chris Uppal wrote:
> > If you must use Unix group permissions, then Nigel Wade's suggestion of
> > having the server write a random number to a file that only it can write
> > and
> > only they can read, and using that for validation, seems adequate. But
> > note that
> > that is vulnerable to network sniffing.
>
> Network sniffing ought not to be much of a problem.
Agreed that if the server only listens on the local interface it's difficult to
eavesdrop (and that's true for Windows as well as *nix as far as I know). But
it feels rather fragile to me.
"The box that hosts the clients is getting a bit overloaded, can we move some
processing onto another box somewhere?"
"Sure, we just move the central server process onto <some machine>. It's
really just a configuration change. Should be easy"
...
"oh"
But, of course, it all depends on Andreas's needs. Even across the LAN, my
suggestion of changing the "password" after each use might be sufficient (or it
might be the worst idea /ever/)...
-- chris
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-03 17:26 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-09-03 13:36 -0400
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2014-09-04 07:42 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-04 07:52 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Josip Almasi <joe@vrspace.org> - 2014-09-04 09:45 +0200
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-04 09:14 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Josip Almasi <joe@vrspace.org> - 2014-09-05 10:20 +0200
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2014-09-04 08:34 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 01:06 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2014-09-04 11:35 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-04 15:11 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2014-09-04 15:57 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-04 16:21 +0100
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 10:55 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute (SOLVED) Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 00:53 +0000
Re: java unix domain sockets ... or substitute (SOLVED) Josip Almasi <joe@vrspace.org> - 2014-09-05 10:23 +0200
csiph-web