Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27856

Re: JDK 8 is there

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx09.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Wayne <nospam@all.invalid>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JDK 8 is there
References <JDK-8-20140318234830@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <quuhi9p4ni256behe2ec9rhakk0q9oc3sj@4ax.com> <q%9Wu.67353$Bm2.20516@fx29.iad> <1loii9l0salejkudl9s9oaa2lcderlpcpe@4ax.com> <zl6Yu.81489$tD4.22859@fx25.iad> <v8p2j9tmasbvsio6nagbue8ub6bbt8s1le@4ax.com> <lgs92n$v63$2@dont-email.me>
In-Reply-To <lgs92n$v63$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 13
Message-ID <s5jYu.60227$%o4.17625@fx09.iad> (permalink)
X-Complaints-To abuse@newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:33:12 UTC
Organization Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:33:19 -0400
X-Received-Bytes 1432
X-Received-Body-CRC 2935676498
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:27856

Show key headers only | View raw

On 3/25/2014 11:58 AM, Knute Johnson wrote:
> On 3/25/2014 04:18, Roedy Green wrote:
>> I was under the delusion you needed a 32 bit JVM for the browser.
> 
> I think you do.  I'm using Win 8.1.  I removed all of Java 7 and installed 8 with no
> difficulties.  I did install 32bit as well for Firefox.  It works more or less.
> 

Just be sure to install the 32-bit JRE last.  Browsers on Windows
don't use PATH to locate the JRE.

-- 
Wayne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:09 -0700
  Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-18 22:11 -0400
  Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:49 -0700
  Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-19 01:34 -0400
    Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-19 02:27 -0700
      Re: JDK 8 is there lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-19 20:30 +0000
        Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-24 21:38 -0400
      Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-24 23:02 -0400
        Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-25 04:18 -0700
          Re: JDK 8 is there Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-03-25 08:58 -0700
            Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-25 13:33 -0400
            Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-25 18:26 -0400

csiph-web