Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27847

Re: JDK 8 is there

From Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JDK 8 is there
Date 2014-03-25 04:18 -0700
Organization Canadian Mind Products
Message-ID <v8p2j9tmasbvsio6nagbue8ub6bbt8s1le@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <JDK-8-20140318234830@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <quuhi9p4ni256behe2ec9rhakk0q9oc3sj@4ax.com> <q%9Wu.67353$Bm2.20516@fx29.iad> <1loii9l0salejkudl9s9oaa2lcderlpcpe@4ax.com> <zl6Yu.81489$tD4.22859@fx25.iad>

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:02:59 -0400, Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>The Windows installer will sometimes copy java.exe from the
>public JRE into C:\Windows.  So, even if your PATH is set
>correctly, unless the JRE\bin folder is near the front, the
>system may still find an older java.exe left over from an
>older install.  (If you install the public JRE along with
>the JDK, it should overwrite the old java.exe.)
>
>To test this, open a command line window, and type:
>   where java

That was the usual problem in the olden days.

But today you can do :

cd E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0\bin
java.exe -version

and it will STILL get the wrong Java.

I got around the problem by uninstalling all the JDKs, pruning files
and registry then installing just one of them. This also made IntelliJ
13.1 idea64.exe start working too.

I was under the delusion you needed a 32 bit JVM for the browser.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
"A great lathe operator commands several times the wage of an average lathe
operator, but a great writer of software code is worth 10,000 times the
price of an average software writer."
~ Bill Gates

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:09 -0700
  Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-18 22:11 -0400
  Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:49 -0700
  Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-19 01:34 -0400
    Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-19 02:27 -0700
      Re: JDK 8 is there lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-19 20:30 +0000
        Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-24 21:38 -0400
      Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-24 23:02 -0400
        Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-25 04:18 -0700
          Re: JDK 8 is there Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-03-25 08:58 -0700
            Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-25 13:33 -0400
            Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-25 18:26 -0400

csiph-web