Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27847
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JDK 8 is there |
| Date | 2014-03-25 04:18 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <v8p2j9tmasbvsio6nagbue8ub6bbt8s1le@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <JDK-8-20140318234830@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <quuhi9p4ni256behe2ec9rhakk0q9oc3sj@4ax.com> <q%9Wu.67353$Bm2.20516@fx29.iad> <1loii9l0salejkudl9s9oaa2lcderlpcpe@4ax.com> <zl6Yu.81489$tD4.22859@fx25.iad> |
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:02:59 -0400, Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >The Windows installer will sometimes copy java.exe from the >public JRE into C:\Windows. So, even if your PATH is set >correctly, unless the JRE\bin folder is near the front, the >system may still find an older java.exe left over from an >older install. (If you install the public JRE along with >the JDK, it should overwrite the old java.exe.) > >To test this, open a command line window, and type: > where java That was the usual problem in the olden days. But today you can do : cd E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0\bin java.exe -version and it will STILL get the wrong Java. I got around the problem by uninstalling all the JDKs, pruning files and registry then installing just one of them. This also made IntelliJ 13.1 idea64.exe start working too. I was under the delusion you needed a 32 bit JVM for the browser. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com "A great lathe operator commands several times the wage of an average lathe operator, but a great writer of software code is worth 10,000 times the price of an average software writer." ~ Bill Gates
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:09 -0700
Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-18 22:11 -0400
Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:49 -0700
Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-19 01:34 -0400
Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-19 02:27 -0700
Re: JDK 8 is there lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-19 20:30 +0000
Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-24 21:38 -0400
Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-24 23:02 -0400
Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-25 04:18 -0700
Re: JDK 8 is there Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-03-25 08:58 -0700
Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-25 13:33 -0400
Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-25 18:26 -0400
csiph-web