Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37857

Re: Calling deprecated methods

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Calling deprecated methods
Date	Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:24:16 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	22
Message-ID	<p142u0$a4f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<40184664@f38.n261.z1.binkp.net> <1782037676@f38.n261.z1.binkp.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:24:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b83cd3450b2cb7410d8dd0ef394c01b0"; logging-data="10383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/gqvLI0txDhUS+OAb/bJx"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To	<1782037676@f38.n261.z1.binkp.net>
Content-Language	en-US
Cancel-Lock	sha1:ozmT/bksf0+H4oZn2lbMZgxK5dI=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37857

Show key headers only | View raw

On 12/15/2017 4:08 PM, Kiwi User (Kiwi User) wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 22:31:59 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
>> On 12/13/17 12:30 AM, Kiwi User (Kiwi User) wrote:
>>>> I know nothing of this sort of testing though I am curious to know how
>>>> you'd find the data that would generate errors when a method accepts a
>>>> number and handles 1, 1.5, and 2 just fine but 1.6 returns an
>>>> incorrect result.
>>>>
>>> Traditionally, you'd read the design specification. The one thing you
>>> MUST NOT do is to look at the code while you're writing tests. You're
>>> trying to test that it does what the requirements say it should and not
>>> what the coder wrote because he may have misunderstood the spec.
>>
> I should have extended this to say that testers should read javadocs output but
>   not the actual source code.

     Is there a place for coverage analysis in this scheme of things?

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
Eleven hundred thirty-one days to go.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Calling deprecated methods Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> (Richard Damon) - 2017-12-15 22:31 +1200
  Re: Calling deprecated methods Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> (Kiwi User) - 2017-12-16 09:08 +1200
    Re: Calling deprecated methods Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-16 16:24 -0500

csiph-web