Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37855
| From | Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> (Richard Damon) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Calling deprecated methods |
| Date | 2017-12-15 22:31 +1200 |
| Organization | fsxNet Usenet Gateway | bbs.geek.nz/#fsxNet |
| Message-ID | <40184664@f38.n261.z1.binkp.net> (permalink) |
| References | <2340509994@f38.n261.z1.binkp.net> |
On 12/13/17 12:30 AM, Kiwi User (Kiwi User) wrote: >> I know nothing of this sort of testing though I am curious to know how >> you'd find the data that would generate errors when a method accepts a >> number and handles 1, 1.5, and 2 just fine but 1.6 returns an incorrect >> result. >> > Traditionally, you'd read the design specification. The one thing you MUST NOT > do is to look at the code while you're writing tests. You're > trying to test that it does what the requirements say it should and not what > the coder wrote because he may have misunderstood the spec. One major exception to this, is that the people who write the code should report to the testers any algorithmic breakpoints that are not implied by the specifications. For instance, the size of the data being processed my affect which method is used to reach the goal. The test suite needs to make sure it exercises every case. Testing likely would test the smallest and largest, but if there is distinct middle case, it might be missed, and tests near the break points might be called for too.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Calling deprecated methods Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> (Richard Damon) - 2017-12-15 22:31 +1200
Re: Calling deprecated methods Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> (Kiwi User) - 2017-12-16 09:08 +1200
Re: Calling deprecated methods Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-16 16:24 -0500
csiph-web