Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37736

Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda?
Date Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:00:59 +0100
Organization albasani.net
Lines 25
Message-ID <p0e5us$eiv$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <321ee28f-bbea-4565-a48e-c0476d9a78d4@googlegroups.com> <ovshh6$8q1$1@dont-email.me> <a7f8b0f0-79cb-4f83-bf77-2ce7d94a2a19@googlegroups.com> <p03i39$n76$1@dont-email.me> <9545f24b-39da-4eab-8c65-365a299b3b2a@googlegroups.com> <p03m3p$ihc$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.albasani.net fjQH2KnbhzoA67WNgvODO2UZwQea/tCTzx7R89ZByU4oPmTU1nDVL5lhOYrq5diPhv+O3Y86ONAMgcwpYrVy9A==
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:01:00 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info news.albasani.net; logging-data="6NhCc0KnRP0esa68a1PDGEwbKoHOr2iNcoTM8ynZwPmq8p5WCZ3K5tWJIciIjD1MivDuo5Y1jdQR2JLwsW/jjjiM2YnMle6DpXrjRuhlr+7nqFkmu4D+TJfbbNXb1nUY"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
In-Reply-To <p03m3p$ihc$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock sha1:u98yEBO9LGHxACfbRwvpCszy2MA=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37736

Show key headers only | View raw


Am 04.12.2017 um 15:29 schrieb Eric Sosman:

>
> I don't know which of these might be faster, or whether either
> might be faster than a plain old `for' loop.  (Research project.)
>
>     FWIW, Brian Goetz (who knows far more about JVM performance
> issues than I ever will) indicates that object allocation and
> collection is cheaper than commonly thought, so there's little
> if any advantage to re-using the same List object:
>
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp09275/index.html
>
> ... which means even more research may be indicated.  (The cited
> article is twelve years old, and we may expect that JVM's have
> continued to improve meanwhile).
>

Angelika Langer did some research into the performance of streams vs. 
for loops when JDK 8 came out. It's referenced from this article, which 
puts performance, readability and maintainability into perspective:

https://blog.jooq.org/2015/12/08/3-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-replace-your-for-loops-by-stream-foreach/

-- Sebastian

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-01 12:52 -0800
  Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-01 16:28 -0500
    Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-04 05:03 -0800
      Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-04 08:20 -0500
        Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-04 05:32 -0800
          Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-04 09:29 -0500
            Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-04 07:14 -0800
            Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2017-12-08 15:00 +0100

csiph-web