Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37716

Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda?

From Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda?
Date 2017-12-04 09:29 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <p03m3p$ihc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <321ee28f-bbea-4565-a48e-c0476d9a78d4@googlegroups.com> <ovshh6$8q1$1@dont-email.me> <a7f8b0f0-79cb-4f83-bf77-2ce7d94a2a19@googlegroups.com> <p03i39$n76$1@dont-email.me> <9545f24b-39da-4eab-8c65-365a299b3b2a@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/4/2017 8:32 AM, Eric Douglas wrote:
> On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 8:20:59 AM UTC-5, Eric Sosman wrote:
>>       If it *must* be an ArrayList (and not some other kind of List),
>> you might want to change the last bit to
>>
>> 	.collect(Collectors.toCollection(ArrayList::new));
>>
>> Although the toList() method appears to use ArrayList anyhow, it
>> doesn't guarantee to do so -- meaning that it might use some other
>> List in a future Java, or in circumstances I haven't studies (e.g.,
>> it might behave differently with a parallel stream).
>>
> ok, thanks, I'll keep that in mind.  I'll have to test if the variable can be assigned and if that would be more efficient.  Currently it doesn't matter what kind of list because I made the rowToModelIndex variable final, just calling clear() then addAll().

     If you'd rather clear and repopulate the same List (as opposed
to making a new one each time), you could use forEach():

	rowModelIndex.clear();
	IntStream.range(0, modelRowCount)
             .filter((value) -> include(value))
	    .forEach((value) -> rowModelIndex.add(value);

or

	rowModelIndex.clear();
	IntStream.range(0, modelRowCount)
	    .forEach((value) ->
	        if (include(value)) rowModelIndex.add(value));

I don't know which of these might be faster, or whether either
might be faster than a plain old `for' loop.  (Research project.)

     FWIW, Brian Goetz (who knows far more about JVM performance
issues than I ever will) indicates that object allocation and
collection is cheaper than commonly thought, so there's little
if any advantage to re-using the same List object:

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp09275/index.html

... which means even more research may be indicated.  (The cited
article is twelve years old, and we may expect that JVM's have
continued to improve meanwhile).

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
Eleven hundred forty-three days to go.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-01 12:52 -0800
  Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-01 16:28 -0500
    Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-04 05:03 -0800
      Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-04 08:20 -0500
        Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-04 05:32 -0800
          Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-04 09:29 -0500
            Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-04 07:14 -0800
            Re: Can I put a filter into a lambda? Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2017-12-08 15:00 +0100

csiph-web