Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35762

Re: double == double

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	4ndre4 <626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920@626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: double == double
Date	Sat, 15 Oct 2016 07:36:16 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	12
Message-ID	<ntsiod$9se$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<double-20161012130409@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ntlr0a$2iq$1@dont-email.me> <nts4og$127g$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 15 Oct 2016 06:35:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="28b36f45a9be49094d07500bc598cea3"; logging-data="10126"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SumCiay4gt4OAUgV2K9YM"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
In-Reply-To	<nts4og$127g$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:+AfrcDBSEiAagQG8T4CusLhsQ0A=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:35762

Show key headers only | View raw

On 15/10/2016 03:37, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

[...]
> I think that the example seen as a whole actually say to avoid == on
> double.

Of course == on double should be avoided. As I said, it's a good rule to 
stick to. However, saying that comparing doubles via == *makes no sense* 
is formally wrong.

-- 
4ndre4

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: double == double 4ndre4 <626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920@626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920.invalid> - 2016-10-12 18:14 +0100
  Re: double == double Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-14 22:37 -0400
    Re: double == double 4ndre4 <626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920@626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920.invalid> - 2016-10-15 07:36 +0100

csiph-web