Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35762

Re: double == double

From	4ndre4 <626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920@626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: double == double
Date	2016-10-15 07:36 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ntsiod$9se$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<double-20161012130409@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ntlr0a$2iq$1@dont-email.me> <nts4og$127g$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 15/10/2016 03:37, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

[...]
> I think that the example seen as a whole actually say to avoid == on
> double.

Of course == on double should be avoided. As I said, it's a good rule to 
stick to. However, saying that comparing doubles via == *makes no sense* 
is formally wrong.

-- 
4ndre4

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: double == double 4ndre4 <626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920@626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920.invalid> - 2016-10-12 18:14 +0100
  Re: double == double Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-14 22:37 -0400
    Re: double == double 4ndre4 <626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920@626401fd-4bc7-4f8f-b641-563ae0f72920.invalid> - 2016-10-15 07:36 +0100

csiph-web