Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35659
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java is faster! |
| Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:51:40 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <nse11l$e82$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <faster-20160923143035@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <1l9fub927k9tntoli9cddnfil6e4o74are@4ax.com> <ns93lq$fpv$1@news.albasani.net> <ns95v0$m1h$1@dont-email.me> <nsc2qk$uip$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:51:33 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bdb23b1d0f1b9c4589502e4f249a232b"; logging-data="14594"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/S9avOs0mYQWf0qolO523Q" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <nsc2qk$uip$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:J9IHJCYJdktqlysEIFGWxAxzJ+o= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:35659 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 9/26/2016 5:09 PM, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Yes and Yes.
> [The second "Yes" answering my question about how he measured
> the cost of casting.]
If your results are not proprietary trade secrets or something,
could you disclose them? We all realize that different machines/JVM's
will produce different timings for identical classes, but even some
not-completely-reliable "indicative" numbers would be of considerable
interest to me, and, I imagine, to others as well.
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
The Tooth Fairy has gone high-tech, now pays in Bitecoin.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Java is faster! Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-09-25 03:28 -0700
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-25 20:05 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-09-25 14:44 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-26 23:09 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-09-27 10:51 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2016-09-28 23:50 +0530
Re: Java is faster! Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-09-28 15:14 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-29 09:11 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-09-29 21:24 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-25 16:37 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 05:47 -0700
Re: Java is faster! Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-10-04 23:04 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-09-29 21:18 -0400
csiph-web