Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35664

Re: Java is faster!

From Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Java is faster!
Date 2016-09-28 23:50 +0530
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <nsh1l8$cl7$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <1l9fub927k9tntoli9cddnfil6e4o74are@4ax.com> <ns93lq$fpv$1@news.albasani.net> <ns95v0$m1h$1@dont-email.me> <nsc2qk$uip$1@news.albasani.net> <nse11l$e82$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 27.09.2016 um 20:21 schrieb Eric Sosman:
> On 9/26/2016 5:09 PM, j4n bur53 wrote:
>> Yes and Yes.
>> [The second "Yes" answering my question about how he measured
>> the cost of casting.]
>
>     If your results are not proprietary trade secrets or something,
> could you disclose them?  We all realize that different machines/JVM's
> will produce different timings for identical classes, but even some
> not-completely-reliable "indicative" numbers would be of considerable
> interest to me, and, I imagine, to others as well.
>
Well, Marko Topolnik has already taken the trouble, see here:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/17764556

tl;dr: there is no noticeable cost to casting

-- Sebastian

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Java is faster! Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-09-25 03:28 -0700
  Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-25 20:05 +0200
    Re: Java is faster! Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-09-25 14:44 -0400
      Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-26 23:09 +0200
        Re: Java is faster! Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-09-27 10:51 -0400
          Re: Java is faster! Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2016-09-28 23:50 +0530
            Re: Java is faster! Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-09-28 15:14 -0400
              Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-29 09:11 +0200
    Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-09-29 21:24 -0400
  Re: Java is faster! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-25 16:37 -0400
    Re: Java is faster! Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 05:47 -0700
      Re: Java is faster! Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-10-04 23:04 +0200
  Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-09-29 21:18 -0400

csiph-web