Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34472
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Why is it called "default constructor"? |
| Date | Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:20:16 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <nivd65$pnn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <default-constructor-20160604183650@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Sat, 4 Jun 2016 20:20:21 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2d081e2f7155c28005d4472f67c2f43d"; logging-data="26359"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18AXb8mHQvaDf9kDS0Nj6Hi" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <default-constructor-20160604183650@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:nbPUqxT1gPTFtGD/7xQbOR5UaxE= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:34472 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 6/4/2016 1:39 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> When a constructor is implicitly declared, it often has no
> parameters and it often is called »default constructor«.
>
> »Default« means »used when something is missing«.
Like, for example, a constructor you didn't write. Every
class requires a constructor, so if you don't write one it is
missing.
> So, why is it called »default constructor«?
Because it's the constructor the compiler writes for you in
the event you fail to write any yourself.
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why is it called "default constructor"? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-06-04 16:20 -0400 Re: Why is it called "default constructor"? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 09:35 -0700
csiph-web