Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34047
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance |
| Date | 2016-03-28 15:04 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ndbv1r$kj1$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <nd6orl$k7m$1@reader1.panix.com> <nd6pps$ee3$1@dont-email.me> <ndbb9g$k7m$3@reader1.panix.com> |
On 3/28/2016 9:24 AM, Popping mad wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:04:07 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote:
>
>> f the nested class is truly supposed to be an inner class (belonging to
>> a Main instance), then you'll need a Main:
>>
>> Main my_main = new Main(); CollectVarsVisitor my_visitor
>> = my_main.new CollectVarsVisitor();
>
>
> Calling for a Class instance from within a class constructor seems like a
> sure fire way to make an infinite loop.
For context, from your original post:
public static void main(String[] args) {
// ...
CollectVarsVisitor my_visitor = new CollectVarsVisitor();
// ...
}
My suggestion was to replace that one line in the middle with the two
I offered. Now: Would either of those lines be inside a constructor?
(Hint: Is `public static void main(String[] args)' a constructor?)
I'm going to repeat an observation I've already made elsethread:
Your grasp of Java is not yet firm enough to allow you to use the
language productively. Back to the books!
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why does Java argue about making a class instance Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-03-26 19:44 +0000
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2016-03-26 21:01 +0100
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-03-28 13:19 +0000
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-28 14:59 -0400
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-26 16:04 -0400
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-03-28 13:24 +0000
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-28 09:50 -0400
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-28 15:04 -0400
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-28 18:30 -0400
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-03-26 20:17 +0000
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-28 10:10 -0400
Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-06-29 00:56 -0700
csiph-web